Difference between revisions of "Template:Citation needed"
| (40 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>'''</noinclude><sup>[[[285: Wikipedian Protester#top|''citation needed'']]]</sup><noinclude>''' | |
| + | <!--This is needed so it doesn't become bold on 285'explanation--> | ||
| + | <!--Personally I think that's a very rough workaround, but you do you Favi. | ||
| + | I agree! If you know of any other way to fix it, please do implement them! | ||
| + | I've replaced it with #top, so it does something when you click it on 285 -FF--> | ||
| + | =='''When I see this, does it mean the content needs citations?'''== | ||
| − | + | No, that notice has a different meaning here than on Wikipedia. '''This template is just a joke''' that originated on Randall's [[what if? (blog)|''what if?'' blog]]. In fact, {{tl|Citation needed}} simply links to [[285: Wikipedian Protester|a comic from 2007]]. It looks like this:{{Citation needed}}. This template should only be placed when there is a deeper sense of humor and should not be overused. For statements that are unsourced and require actual reliable citations (such as sentences like "Randall has said he regrets making this comic."), use the {{tl|Actual citation needed}} template instead. It looks like this:{{Actual citation needed}}. When you see it, it means the content is unsourced and unreliable, like on Wikipedia. [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#citation|Learn more at the Editor FAQ]]. | |
| − | Given below is a helpful chart to show how to use this template properly. | + | Given below is a helpful chart to show how to use this template properly, by putting it ''after'' the punctuation. |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | !✘ | + | !<span style="color:red"><big><big>✘</big></big></span> |
| − | !✔ | + | !<span style="color:green"><big><big>✔</big></big></span> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Obviously true sentence{{Citation needed}}, |
| − | | | + | |Obviously true sentence,<sup>[[[285: Wikipedian Protester|''citation needed'']]]</sup> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Obviously true sentence{{Citation needed}}. |
| − | | | + | |Obviously true sentence.<sup>[[[285: Wikipedian Protester|''citation needed'']]]</sup> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |( | + | |(Obviously true sentence{{Citation needed}}) |
| − | |( | + | |(Obviously true sentence)<sup>[[[285: Wikipedian Protester|''citation needed'']]]</sup> |
|} | |} | ||
[[Category:Templates]] | [[Category:Templates]] | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:32, 27 July 2025
When I see this, does it mean the content needs citations?
No, that notice has a different meaning here than on Wikipedia. This template is just a joke that originated on Randall's what if? blog. In fact, {{Citation needed}} simply links to a comic from 2007. It looks like this:[citation needed]. This template should only be placed when there is a deeper sense of humor and should not be overused. For statements that are unsourced and require actual reliable citations (such as sentences like "Randall has said he regrets making this comic."), use the {{Actual citation needed}} template instead. It looks like this:[actual citation needed]. When you see it, it means the content is unsourced and unreliable, like on Wikipedia. Learn more at the Editor FAQ.
Given below is a helpful chart to show how to use this template properly, by putting it after the punctuation.
| ✘ | ✔ |
|---|---|
| Obviously true sentence[citation needed], | Obviously true sentence,[citation needed] |
| Obviously true sentence[citation needed]. | Obviously true sentence.[citation needed] |
| (Obviously true sentence[citation needed]) | (Obviously true sentence)[citation needed] |
