Difference between revisions of "Talk:3201: Proof Without Content"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
First. Would be funny to have an explanation along the lines of "It is possible to give an explanation with no content. Here's how:" [[User:R128|R128]] ([[User talk:R128|talk]]) 17:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
 
First. Would be funny to have an explanation along the lines of "It is possible to give an explanation with no content. Here's how:" [[User:R128|R128]] ([[User talk:R128|talk]]) 17:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
  
βˆ’
Proof without Content seems to be a play of words for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words]
+
Proof without Content seems to be a play of words for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words]Proof without Words

Revision as of 17:51, 30 January 2026


First. Would be funny to have an explanation along the lines of "It is possible to give an explanation with no content. Here's how:" R128 (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Proof without Content seems to be a play of words for [1]Proof without Words