Editing 1052: Every Major's Terrible

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 93: Line 93:
  
 
;Panels 33 and 34, ''By dubbing econ "dismal science" adherents exaggerate;'' ''The "dismal"'s fine - it's "science" where they patently prevaricate.'': "Econ" is short for "{{w|economics}}".  {{w|Thomas Carlyle}} declared economics "{{w|the dismal science}}" in the {{w|Victorian era}} as a derogatory alternative name. {{w|Economists}} often claim that economics is a {{w|science}} like any other; however, as the predictive powers of all economic theories are exceedingly weak compared to those of any science, this is disputed by those outside the field at times. It is of course also disputed by this song, in which Cueball "clearly" (see below) states that economics should not call itself a science - that is the ''dismal science'' is not derogatory enough for him.  
 
;Panels 33 and 34, ''By dubbing econ "dismal science" adherents exaggerate;'' ''The "dismal"'s fine - it's "science" where they patently prevaricate.'': "Econ" is short for "{{w|economics}}".  {{w|Thomas Carlyle}} declared economics "{{w|the dismal science}}" in the {{w|Victorian era}} as a derogatory alternative name. {{w|Economists}} often claim that economics is a {{w|science}} like any other; however, as the predictive powers of all economic theories are exceedingly weak compared to those of any science, this is disputed by those outside the field at times. It is of course also disputed by this song, in which Cueball "clearly" (see below) states that economics should not call itself a science - that is the ''dismal science'' is not derogatory enough for him.  
*The above sentences can be tricky to understand due to the combination of vocabulary used and atypical word order (the former is in object-subject-verb). Here is some help in understanding them:
+
*The sentences uttered by Cueball in these two panels are extremely difficult English for non-native English speakers.  
 +
*Here is some help in understanding the sentences:
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dub Dubbing] something means ''giving it a nickname''.
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dub Dubbing] something means ''giving it a nickname''.
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dismal Dismal] science means (in this context) ''the disappointingly inadequate science''.
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dismal Dismal] science means (in this context) ''the disappointingly inadequate science''.
Line 100: Line 101:
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/prevaricate Prevaricate] means to ''evade the truth''.
 
**[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/prevaricate Prevaricate] means to ''evade the truth''.
 
*Using these meanings of the words the two sentences can be re-written as:
 
*Using these meanings of the words the two sentences can be re-written as:
**The people who give economics the nickname "the inadequate science" are exaggerating how bad it is;
+
**By giving economics the nickname "the inadequate science" the supporters [of economics] exaggerate;
**The "inadequate" part is fine - it's "science" where they clearly are evading the truth.
+
**The "inadequate" is fine - it's "science" where they evade the truth in a clear and unambiguous manner.
:That is, Cueball is saying that "inadequate science" is too nice of a term for economics, he thinks it's not even science at all.
+
*That is, Cueball is saying that "inadequate science" is too nice of a term for economics, he thinks it's not even science at all.
  
 
;Panel 35, ''In terms of choices, I'd say only Sophie's was comparable.''
 
;Panel 35, ''In terms of choices, I'd say only Sophie's was comparable.''

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)