Difference between revisions of "Talk:1029: Drawing Stars"
(Added an point of view.) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The cursor and the drawing looks a bit like [[http://docs.python.org/2/library/turtle.html|Python's turtle mode]], that would explain the "Abort abort" reaction as the user would like to stop the script where it is. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.111|108.162.229.111]] 12:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC) | The cursor and the drawing looks a bit like [[http://docs.python.org/2/library/turtle.html|Python's turtle mode]], that would explain the "Abort abort" reaction as the user would like to stop the script where it is. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.111|108.162.229.111]] 12:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | He actually looks like he's very much on the right track to drawing an octogram. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.226|108.162.219.226]] 21:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:23, 18 May 2020
They are however, incredibly easy to sew[1] 146.115.187.103 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
The nice thing about knowing lots of geometric stars is that I could have easily salvaged that to make a slightly squashed 8-pointed star polygon (a.k.a. octagram, Schläfli symbol {8/3}). --Quicksilver (talk) 06:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Same here lol. I tried right after I read it and I actually got a tridecagram {13/5} thing. 108.162.222.148 16:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
The cursor and the drawing looks a bit like [turtle mode], that would explain the "Abort abort" reaction as the user would like to stop the script where it is. 108.162.229.111 12:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
He actually looks like he's very much on the right track to drawing an octogram. 108.162.219.226 21:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)