Editing Talk:1583: NASA Press Conference
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::: Word would spread, but details would be lost in the retelling (perhaps a general mind-force attempt by Ben to cloud the issue in the minds of all the witnesses; easy to do when everyone's already readily in a "I was never there, I never saw anything" mindset to start with, when they were doubtless prepared to turn a blind eye to a barside-assault upon Luke) and, besides which, there ''are'' no Jedi left. Something else must have happened, and they were deliberately not paying attention, right? | ::: Word would spread, but details would be lost in the retelling (perhaps a general mind-force attempt by Ben to cloud the issue in the minds of all the witnesses; easy to do when everyone's already readily in a "I was never there, I never saw anything" mindset to start with, when they were doubtless prepared to turn a blind eye to a barside-assault upon Luke) and, besides which, there ''are'' no Jedi left. Something else must have happened, and they were deliberately not paying attention, right? | ||
::: Or it could be a cock-up in the script, but as it's not the Prequel Trilogy, I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 14:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | ::: Or it could be a cock-up in the script, but as it's not the Prequel Trilogy, I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 14:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
I think the "is it ruined" line of questions in the third panel is treating Mars as a smartphone, considering Mars to be damaged because it "got wet" and asking if Mars will be okay after it "dries out". [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.42|108.162.216.42]] 18:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | I think the "is it ruined" line of questions in the third panel is treating Mars as a smartphone, considering Mars to be damaged because it "got wet" and asking if Mars will be okay after it "dries out". [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.42|108.162.216.42]] 18:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
::actually, I think it refers to a mars bar. If that gets (too) wet, it's not really edible anymore... {{unsigned ip|141.101.105.180}} | ::actually, I think it refers to a mars bar. If that gets (too) wet, it's not really edible anymore... {{unsigned ip|141.101.105.180}} | ||
− | |||
Could we maybe include a few examples of ill-informed questions from previous press conferences? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.129}} | Could we maybe include a few examples of ill-informed questions from previous press conferences? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.129}} | ||
Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
So apparently no one thought moss and cockroaches was a good idea? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.225|162.158.38.225]] 14:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | So apparently no one thought moss and cockroaches was a good idea? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.225|162.158.38.225]] 14:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |