Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| To be fair, the UI is so bad that that alone is barrier enough for downloading the pdf. :D Also, people might now fight me, because it's really easy if you know what to do. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 19:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC) | | To be fair, the UI is so bad that that alone is barrier enough for downloading the pdf. :D Also, people might now fight me, because it's really easy if you know what to do. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 19:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
| | | |
| + | |
| + | What fields are they taking about? Which have been most open to sites like arXiv and which have been most reluctant? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.161|108.162.246.161]] 19:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 13: |
Line 15: |
| | | |
| [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.96|162.158.106.96]] 20:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC) | | [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.96|162.158.106.96]] 20:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
− |
| |
− | :A group of publishing companies are currently taking legal action against websites that share published papers unofficially [http://www.responsiblesharing.org/coalition-statement/]. I don't know if this applies to the ones mentioned in the comic, but it partly comes down to whether the article is in it's final 'published' format which is copyright of the journal, or an earlier pre-print version not using the publisher's template where the copyright may still be owned by the authors. On the other hand, some publishers have embraced the pre-print model and created their own servers [https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/chemistry-preprint-server-plan-generates-sparks/1017239.article]. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.178|162.158.34.178]] 21:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | : Propably also interesting https://www.projekt-deal.de/about-deal [[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.52|162.158.202.52]] 04:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | Here is information on how preprints are different than peer-reviewed publications http://holly.witteman.ca/index.php/2017/12/11/getting-access-to-paywalled-papers/
| |
− | : Link rot detected, corrected link found https://holly.witteman.ca/getting-access-to-paywalled-papers/
| |
− |
| |
− | '''Can someone deduce the field Ponytail is working on?'''
| |
− |
| |
− | What fields are they taking about? Which have been most open to sites like arXiv and which have been most reluctant? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.161|108.162.246.161]] 19:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | :I know that pretty much every astronomy paper is on arXiv.
| |
− |
| |
− | :arXiv is definitely an astronomer's haven. I don't think even physicists use it as much. And actually, quite hilariously, apparently arXiv recently stopped accepting research notes, and that made AAS Journal that publish these research notes most disappointed [https://twitter.com/AAS_ResNotes/status/1072232650491002881].
| |
− |
| |
− | :Everything in atomic physics is there too. I can't remember any recent paper I searched that was not on arXiv.
| |
− |
| |
− | :Everything math related is there as well.
| |
− |
| |
− | :Just a bit late, but four years later ''Nature'' Podcast answers: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01985-5
| |
− | :It's biology and medicine that were largely not using the preprint servers until the COVID-19 pandemic. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]])
| |