Editing Talk:2890: Relationship Advice

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 14: Line 14:
 
:If I were to classify WH's scenario, though, he's just had a sudden setback in some relationship, and it's the shock that's making him ramble. His companions know that something's happened, but are perhaps not fully aware of what it is that has hit him hard. - But I was never that good with social cues. If I'm anywhere close to general opinion then it's only because everyone else is equally lacking in the non-stick-figure body language and audible cues. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.20|172.69.194.20]] 00:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 
:If I were to classify WH's scenario, though, he's just had a sudden setback in some relationship, and it's the shock that's making him ramble. His companions know that something's happened, but are perhaps not fully aware of what it is that has hit him hard. - But I was never that good with social cues. If I'm anywhere close to general opinion then it's only because everyone else is equally lacking in the non-stick-figure body language and audible cues. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.20|172.69.194.20]] 00:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 
I want to thank Randal Monroe for telling me in advance how not to talk to my kids about relationships. {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.155|16:44, 7 February 2024}}
 
I want to thank Randal Monroe for telling me in advance how not to talk to my kids about relationships. {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.155|16:44, 7 February 2024}}
 
my intepretation was not based on the discussed issue (relationship), but based on the structure of the discussion - it felt like Randall also wanted to point out, how you can start with a widely accepted opinion to one most people won't angree by doing baby steps. Changing "not easy" to "hard" is understandable and in context of logic the same. If something is hard, it requires work - that makes sense. If zou have to work, it's a job, that makes sense, too. And now, in the second part, Randall jumps the shark (like most of the time) and changes job to overwhelming, implicating that a job is the same as being overwhelmed. Being overwhelmed is a crushing burden (language wise it is really similar: "over"helmed and something crushing down). And lastly, it's an Ordeal. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.160.125|172.71.160.125]] 14:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 
  
 
== It's not 'tag misuse' ==
 
== It's not 'tag misuse' ==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: