Editing Talk:747: Geeks and Nerds
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I'm sure Randall is good enough to qualify for both distinctions, as would most of those that post anything here... But he just grew up with these definition and states that they may vary. This would not be acceptable if you had strong opinions on the subject, so I would say no to the reason you state that he should qualify. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | :I'm sure Randall is good enough to qualify for both distinctions, as would most of those that post anything here... But he just grew up with these definition and states that they may vary. This would not be acceptable if you had strong opinions on the subject, so I would say no to the reason you state that he should qualify. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
The definition in the alt-text does not agree with the picture. In the picture neither geeks nor nerds are a subset of the other; in the definition being a nerd implies also being a geek. This comment might be both, but that's why we're here, isn't it? [[User:Lii|Lii]] ([[User talk:Lii|talk]]) 18:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC) | The definition in the alt-text does not agree with the picture. In the picture neither geeks nor nerds are a subset of the other; in the definition being a nerd implies also being a geek. This comment might be both, but that's why we're here, isn't it? [[User:Lii|Lii]] ([[User talk:Lii|talk]]) 18:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |