Difference between revisions of "Talk:877: Beauty"
Nitpicking (talk | contribs) (Unweaving the Rainbow) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I can't believe nobody's mentioned NetHack. [http://nethack.wikia.com/wiki/Slime_mold My! That was a yummy slime mold!] [[User:Leafy Greens|Leafy Greens]] ([[User talk:Leafy Greens|talk]]) 21:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | I can't believe nobody's mentioned NetHack. [http://nethack.wikia.com/wiki/Slime_mold My! That was a yummy slime mold!] [[User:Leafy Greens|Leafy Greens]] ([[User talk:Leafy Greens|talk]]) 21:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Richard Dawkins wrote a book, ''Unweaving the Rainbow'', debunking Megan's original thesis. (Published 1998) [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 23:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:01, 8 September 2021
In his book The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, Richard Feynman takes exception to the common characterization of scientists as unable to see beauty. He also mentioned this in a 1981 interview.--Prooffreader (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
08:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)overanalyze probably is the point where there is no need which could mean while scientist miss the beauty and wonder while others wonder at the Beauty. Though they see beauty in things which are not conventional
Beauty is not only sink deep.
I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I can't believe nobody's mentioned NetHack. My! That was a yummy slime mold! Leafy Greens (talk) 21:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Richard Dawkins wrote a book, Unweaving the Rainbow, debunking Megan's original thesis. (Published 1998) Nitpicking (talk) 23:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
