Difference between revisions of "User talk:DiEvAl"
(→Template geekwagon) |
(→Template geekwagon) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why this template? All pictures are available here too. Geekwagon is great, but we never can know how long it will last.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | Why this template? All pictures are available here too. Geekwagon is great, but we never can know how long it will last.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Most people used geekwagon and not images here anyways. This just makes it simpler. Your argument is totally valid, but it's against using geekwagon, and not against this template. --[[User:DiEvAl|DiEvAl]] ([[User talk:DiEvAl|talk]]) 23:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | :Most people used geekwagon and not images here anyways. This just makes it simpler. Your argument is totally valid, but it's against using geekwagon, and not against this template. --[[User:DiEvAl|DiEvAl]] ([[User talk:DiEvAl|talk]]) 23:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Please DO NOT edit the discussion section, the posts originate to other users here! Geekwagon or not.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Sorry. How do I undo edits that are not consecutive? --[[User:DiEvAl|DiEvAl]] ([[User talk:DiEvAl|talk]]) 23:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Your template is OK, but you did edit discussion posts. Just focus on the explanation pages. Discussion is just that what it's name does say. But your edits are not a big problem, I was just asking you to stop, mostly because wrong links could be the result.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:26, 17 July 2013
Template geekwagon[edit]
Why this template? All pictures are available here too. Geekwagon is great, but we never can know how long it will last.--Dgbrt (talk) 23:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Most people used geekwagon and not images here anyways. This just makes it simpler. Your argument is totally valid, but it's against using geekwagon, and not against this template. --DiEvAl (talk) 23:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
