Difference between revisions of "explain xkcd talk:Editor FAQ"
(→Formatting of explanations: new section) |
(→Formatting of explanations) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think we should have a small style guide to encourage sane formatting. What else should such guidelines contain? | I think we should have a small style guide to encourage sane formatting. What else should such guidelines contain? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Edit: One more thing I'd love to see: semantic headlines (i.e. < h3> headlines for explanation subchapters instead of < h2> which is the same level as the explanation itself) | ||
<small>(Sidenote: I've been active on explainxkcd for quite some time, but only now got around making an account.)</small> [[User:Gir|//gir.st/]] ([[User talk:Gir|talk]]) 15:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC) | <small>(Sidenote: I've been active on explainxkcd for quite some time, but only now got around making an account.)</small> [[User:Gir|//gir.st/]] ([[User talk:Gir|talk]]) 15:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:26, 19 August 2018
Feel free to enter any question about editing this Wiki and don't forget to sign you comment. --Dgbrt (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Formatting of explanations
Many pages contain tables where a definition list would be 1) easier to read 2) mobile friendly, for example: 1957.
I was also involved in rewriting the transcript for 1963, where the discussion came up about how those should be styled. ("as if you were reading the comic to someone")
I think we should have a small style guide to encourage sane formatting. What else should such guidelines contain?
Edit: One more thing I'd love to see: semantic headlines (i.e. < h3> headlines for explanation subchapters instead of < h2> which is the same level as the explanation itself)
(Sidenote: I've been active on explainxkcd for quite some time, but only now got around making an account.) //gir.st/ (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)