Talk:690: Semicontrolled Demolition
Sorry haven't posted before so probably doing this in the wrong way. The description says there's no video footage of the first plane, but there's a video taken of firefighters checking man hole covers who caught it. It's on you tube, but I didn't think it was right to post the link.
Edit: on second look I see a link has been put to second impact, so no reason not to post link to first:
220.127.116.11 09:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Bob
- Thanks for your input, and you're right! I corrected that in the explanation.
- You only "did this in the wrong way" in that you should have edited directly the explanation . As on most wikis, the general motto here is Be bold: don't hesitate, just do it!
- Thanks again - Cos (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- It seems as if it is censored. 18.104.22.168 05:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Unless an incomplete shows a specific lack, and I can't find one myself, I will delete the incomplete tag. Anonymous. 00:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't the most extreme claim be that the entire collapse of the towers was faked? ...as in, they're still there, but with help from Copperfield, They hid it from everyone and created the whole media storm to distract from blah blah blah? Brettpeirce (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Even if the truth does always lie between the two extremes, how do we know it wasn't the South Tower that was the inside job? Then Cueball would be twice as wrong as the MSM (who were right about the North Tower) or the truthers (who were right about the South Tower). Promethean (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)