Talk:750: Book Burning

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search

"...the Kindle edition is the preferred method of buying a book."? A bit subjective, really. Needs more qualifications to make that sound right. (Except for the aforementioned price, I'm not sure what argument would convince me, however technophilic I am. I just like all my dead-tree publications, as a glance at my bookshelves and multiple other 'flat' surfaces around the house would confirm.)

Oh yeah, and as I forgot to sign the above, can I also add that I'm sure there's also a joke in that in an attempt to eradicate a book, the protesters are actually increasing the apparent demand for it. And, unlike a physical volume the misguided destruction of the electronic copy (or at least the medium it exists on) does not deplete any extant stocks. (In fact, the person who bought and downloaded the eBook can probably re-download the eBook if the download mechanism allows that for previously authorised purchases.) And do it enough and they may even print extra physical copies. (Soon to be coming to a remaindered book shop near you, and you, and you as well sir... Way to go to spread the Word!) "Epic Fail", anyone? 178.98.192.132 23:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Book-burning incidents

While the joke is about burning a Kindle, I'm still sad about burning books. Look here: List of book-burning incidents. Burning a book is a kind of violence, this should be mentioned here. This comic is marked as incomplete.--Dgbrt (talk) 20:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

The comic is obviously mocking the intelligence of those radicals that would really like to see "heretical" books burn.--Qwach (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The German Nazis did state Jewish and critical books as "heretical". But I'm still searching for some proper statements at this comic. Does Randall refer to the gas chambers at the concentration camps? By the end the Nazi empire did die in 1945. Nevertheless, burning books reminds me always on that historical incidents.--Dgbrt (talk) 19:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

There should be some mention about how the digital copy wouldn't affect the market as much, thereby making their intent null, and also the fact that burning a kindle as opposed to burning a book would actually increase the cost. --Lackadaisical (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Buy it, but put it on a cheap, $1.00 flash drive then it costs less, but still emits fumes

I guess they should have just pirated the digital copy around (thus 'burning' it and spreading it at the same time)141.101.99.195 07:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)