2766: Helium Reserve

|< < Prev Comic #2766 (April 21, 2023) Next > >|

Helium Reserve

Title text: The government has been trying to sell off the Federal Helium Reserve for a few years now, but the sale has been on hold while they try to figure out how to explain this situation to buyers.

Explanation

This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by DONALD DUCK - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon. If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.

The Strategic National Helium Reserve is a reserve of helium in the United States, which holds more than 1 billion cubic meters of helium. Apparently, in this comic, Randall was hired to manage the reserve, and due to the fact that the caption says that he can not explain anything out loud, it can be inferred that Randall used all of it by repeatedly inhaling the helium supply, so speaking would instantly give away where the helium has gone since the helium would make his voice squeaky.

Transcript

This transcript is incomplete. Please help editing it! Thanks.

[An officer is talking to Cueball. There is a "National Strategic Helium Reserve" building in the background.]

Officer: You were in charge of guarding the national helium reserve. So where did it go?!

[Caption below the panel:]

Unfortunately, there's no good way for me to answer this question out loud.

 add a comment! ⋅  add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅  refresh comments!

Discussion

So, uh... is the reason he can't say it out loud because he inhaled it all and the squeaky voice would give it away? LtPowers (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

That was my first thought. Darthpoppins (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

What do I say about the person who was in charge of giving me sole control of the helium reserves? I would definitely speak highly of him! 172.70.90.252 15:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I think he cannot say anything loud because helium is stored in porous rock underground (here is Tom Scott's video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOy8Xjaa_o8) and it is embarrassing to say that you just pump expensive gas into the ground. not sure tho 162.158.238.234 16:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Wouldn't that be just as embarassing to write down? "say out loud" clearly implies that the joke is about the squeaky voice. The last paragraph, with the "more realistic explanation", seems unnecessary. Barmar (talk) 21:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I originally thought he just made a bunch of helium balloons or something, which floated away, but the "out loud" part does seem to imply inhalation. Given the implication of culpability/embarrassment preventing him from answering the question, I definitely think an accidental leak is not the intended explanation. It should be something frivolous, and I think that "out loud" part of the caption makes helium inhalation the most likely explanation.172.70.38.141 14:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Side note: Cody's Lab created a series of videos where he's not only using lighter-than-air gases, but also heavier-than-air gases. --JakubNarebski (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I would guess the remark about the government being embarrassed has to with the sell-off of the reserve being a bit of a political football since 1996 172.69.79.137 (talk) 01:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

What, no joke about MRI? I'm disappointed... 172.70.46.45 12:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

I thought he'd have to say the helium disappeared into thin air, and that it would've been too much if a dad joke :D 162.158.238.223 18:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I was actually thinking that the helium would have left earth and been attracted by Uranus gravity for some reason... it went up Uranus! 172.70.46.70 17:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Another interpretation is that Cueball's voice was too high-pitched for a human to percieve 162.158.197.149 02:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

He can't explain the situation to buyers because it's too embarrassing to talk about how inflated the prices are. (I'll get my coat.) 172.70.175.210 19:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I wonder how much this would actually change a person's voice if they could handle it. Maybe you could shatter glass with it. Psychoticpotato (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

It's a bit of a misunderstanding that "any high note" can just shatter (a) glass. It has to be the right note (or a harmonic), and be sustained long enough to build up the constructive resonances to the point of becoming destructively shattering. (At the simplest, if you 'ping' a glass and hear a nice, distinct note/frequency, then 'sing' that back at it for long enough and loud enough...)

Merely 'talking' at a high pitch wouldn't be very effective. You might not hit a useful pitch. If you do then probably whilst your voice rises and falls past it. No sustaining of tone. There'll be gaps for breath/between words/across consonants/etc, where you're not adding energy (not even off-frequency). And probably not enough amplitude (unless you're BRIAN BLESSED!) to overcome air-damping unless you're pressing your mouth right up against the item (that we are 'expecting' to shatter into shards, any moment..!)

There's a reason why it's opera singers (with high noted ranges, so usually a soprano) that get ascribed this 'super-power'. They are trained (physically and mentally) to potentially have the ability to reproduce a valid note – and do so loudly, longly and consistently enough to create the effect desired. Perhaps breathing some helium mix might assist the reaching of necessary upper-registers for someone normally not quite capable (mezzo-soprano, or counter-tennor), but it'd still need more than the mere tonal voice-changing. Unless it's a particularly fragile and vulnerable glass/piece-of-glass/other-glass-item. 141.101.99.82 08:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

You didn't need to write all of that. I know how the phenomenon works. I was just making a joke, which are sometimes inaccurate in their portrait of reality. Psychoticpotato (talk) 15:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

With nary a smiley, even, it fould (it was!) be read as serious. I didn't know that it was a frog that shouldn't be dissected. (Even so, others might have taken it seriously, but are now potentially better informed.) 172.71.242.42 16:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)