Difference between revisions of "Talk:1627: Woosh"
Phoenix616 (talk | contribs) m (fixed Duartix' youtube link) |
Z1mp0st0rz (talk | contribs) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::Woooosh! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.181|108.162.245.181]] 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ::Woooosh! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.181|108.162.245.181]] 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::::Woosh | + | ::::Woosh {{{unsigned ip|108.162.245.131}} |
::::::'''Woof''' ''(Guess my bot still needs some work)'' [[Special:Contributions/162.158.153.131|162.158.153.131]] 08:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ::::::'''Woof''' ''(Guess my bot still needs some work)'' [[Special:Contributions/162.158.153.131|162.158.153.131]] 08:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::::: woof (i just gave up on it when it said woof. maybe woofbots are the next generation) {{unsigned|Squishmallow fan|20:57, 20 April 2024}} | ||
If it was a joke video that was never meant to be real to begin with and the commenter didn't realize this, then woosh would actually make sense [[User:Figvh|Figvh]] ([[User talk:Figvh|talk]]) | If it was a joke video that was never meant to be real to begin with and the commenter didn't realize this, then woosh would actually make sense [[User:Figvh|Figvh]] ([[User talk:Figvh|talk]]) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
Probably in reaction to a video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEI-iDxfj0M] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. | Probably in reaction to a video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEI-iDxfj0M] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. | ||
[[User:Duartix|Duartix]] ([[User talk:Duartix|talk]]) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | [[User:Duartix|Duartix]] ([[User talk:Duartix|talk]]) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * You mean [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pxkboPjn8c]? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Of course bots that auto-reply to comments can have problems of their own. Let Reddit's [http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/925/182/df3.png lolpenisbot] be a cautionary tale.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.152.203|162.158.152.203]] 21:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Woosh [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.38|141.101.98.38]] 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Woosh [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.38|141.101.98.38]] 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Woosh [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.38|141.101.98.38]] 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This comic seems to promote the same behaviour that he criticizes in [https://xkcd.com/481/ xkcd.com/481], [https://xkcd.com/810/ xkcd.com/810], [https://xkcd.com/1258/ xkcd.com/1258], and i'm sure others. I've seen a great deal of 'wooshing' in the past couple days, hopefully this disservice to the internet doesn't last.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.152.131|162.158.152.131]] 11:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Woosh [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 21:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: Are you for real?[[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.41|199.27.133.41]] 23:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: I'm taking a screenshot so I can remember this moment forever. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.76|108.162.238.76]] 05:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::: Comment of the year [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Help_with_Creating_a_User_Page|Trogdor147]] ([[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Help_with_Creating_a_User_Page|talk]]) 01:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcdwooshbot/ It now exists. Might we add this as a note on the article? [[User:Wolf9400|Wolf9400]] | ||
| + | :Maybe in a trivia section? -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 00:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wait, isn't this exactly the reason why explainxkcd.com exists? To look for non-existent hidden jokes in xkcd. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.214.149|108.162.214.149]] 10:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Comment of the year.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.34|108.162.216.34]] 20:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Woosh [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.119|162.158.62.119]] 16:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think I've found something even more amazing that "woosh" that can confuse people WAY more. Ever heard of {{w|0x10c|0x10c?}} Try typing that on a social network like Candid and see what happens. People get so confused. xD --[[User:JayRulesXKCD|'''JayRules''XKCD''' ]]<sup>[[User talk:JayRulesXKCD|what's up?]]</sup> 17:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | :0x10c[[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.21|108.162.242.21]] 14:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :woosh woosh woosh (stops) HeY thERe WaSSuP >;) [[User:Z1mp0st0rz|The sus lol]] ([[User talk:Z1mp0st0rz|talk]]) 20:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:17, 29 April 2024
Looking for a joke that isn't there sounds a lot like xkcd.com/559. 162.158.2.140 05:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woooosh! 108.162.245.181 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh { 108.162.245.131 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Woof (Guess my bot still needs some work) 162.158.153.131 08:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- woof (i just gave up on it when it said woof. maybe woofbots are the next generation) -- Squishmallow fan (talk) 20:57, 20 April 2024 (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
If it was a joke video that was never meant to be real to begin with and the commenter didn't realize this, then woosh would actually make sense Figvh (talk)
- Woosh173.245.56.65 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Probably in reaction to a video [1] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. Duartix (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Of course bots that auto-reply to comments can have problems of their own. Let Reddit's lolpenisbot be a cautionary tale.162.158.152.203 21:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
This comic seems to promote the same behaviour that he criticizes in xkcd.com/481, xkcd.com/810, xkcd.com/1258, and i'm sure others. I've seen a great deal of 'wooshing' in the past couple days, hopefully this disservice to the internet doesn't last.--162.158.152.131 11:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woosh Spongebog (talk) 21:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are you for real?199.27.133.41 23:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm taking a screenshot so I can remember this moment forever. 108.162.238.76 05:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment of the year Trogdor147 (talk) 01:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm taking a screenshot so I can remember this moment forever. 108.162.238.76 05:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are you for real?199.27.133.41 23:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcdwooshbot/ It now exists. Might we add this as a note on the article? Wolf9400
- Maybe in a trivia section? -Pennpenn 108.162.250.162 00:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Wait, isn't this exactly the reason why explainxkcd.com exists? To look for non-existent hidden jokes in xkcd. 108.162.214.149 10:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment of the year.108.162.216.34 20:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Woosh 162.158.62.119 16:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
I think I've found something even more amazing that "woosh" that can confuse people WAY more. Ever heard of 0x10c? Try typing that on a social network like Candid and see what happens. People get so confused. xD --JayRulesXKCD what's up? 17:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- 0x10c108.162.242.21 14:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- woosh woosh woosh (stops) HeY thERe WaSSuP >;) The sus lol (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
