Difference between revisions of "1833: Code Quality 3"
(Fixed wikipedia links) |
(→Transcript) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Ponytail: Your code looks like song lyrics written using only the stuff that comes after the question mark in a URL. | :Ponytail: Your code looks like song lyrics written using only the stuff that comes after the question mark in a URL. | ||
:Cueball (off-panel): Sorry. | :Cueball (off-panel): Sorry. | ||
− | :[Zoom in on Ponytail.] | + | :[Zoom in on Ponytail's upper body.] |
− | :Ponytail: It's like a JSON table of model numbers for flashlights with "tactical" in their names | + | :Ponytail: It's like a JSON table of model numbers for flashlights with "tactical" in their names. |
− | :[Zoom back out again] | + | :[Zoom back out again. Ponytail has lifted her hands off the table.] |
:Ponytail: Like you read Turing's 1936 paper on computing and a page of JavaScript example code and guessed at everything in between. | :Ponytail: Like you read Turing's 1936 paper on computing and a page of JavaScript example code and guessed at everything in between. | ||
− | :[Zoom in again on Ponytail's face] | + | :[Zoom in again on Ponytail's face.] |
:Ponytail: It's like a leet-speak translation of a manifesto by a survivalist cult leader who's for some reason obsessed with memory allocation. | :Ponytail: It's like a leet-speak translation of a manifesto by a survivalist cult leader who's for some reason obsessed with memory allocation. | ||
− | :Cueball (off-panel): I can get someone else to review my code | + | :Cueball (off-panel): I can get someone else to review my code. |
:Ponytail: Not more than once, I bet. | :Ponytail: Not more than once, I bet. | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 5 May 2017
Code Quality 3 |
Title text: It's like a half-solved cryptogram where the solution is a piece of FORTH code written by someone who doesn't know FORTH. |
Explanation
This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon. If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks. |
This comic is a direct continuation of 1513: Code Quality and 1695: Code Quality 2 in the Code Quality series, in which Ponytail continually insults Cueball's code style. In this comic, as in the previous, Cueball does not directly appear, only speaking off-panel; however, as it is a continuation of the series, it is clear that this is Cueball's code.
In the first panel, Ponytail references query strings, which store information, such as search queries or page numbers, relevant to the URL. Query strings are not meant to be especially human-readable, so a song based on one would likely not be a good one.
A tactical light is a light that can be mounted on a gun for use in low-light scenarios. They tend to be very durable and very bright. Different models have different features and capabilities, so they are given cool-sounding model numbers. A JSON table of these model numbers would look like random data.
Alan Turing was a British theoretical computer scientist, often considered the father of the field. His 1936 paper outlined Turing machines, a theoretical model for computing, as well as computability and the halting problem. Theoretical computer science is very different from practical coding; understanding the contents of the paper would not at all help a coder to understand today's algorithms, design patterns, and best practices.
In the final panel, Ponytail references leet-speak, in which symbols are replaced with similar-looking symbols, and a manifesto, a statement of a person or group's beliefs and intentions. A manifesto from a survivalist cult leader would likely be nonsensical, even before being translated to leet-speak. Memory allocation is a low-level computer programming concept; most modern languages have features that take care of memory allocation for the programmer, possibly implying that Cueball does not know how to use these features.
At the end of the final panel, Cueball, seeing that Ponytail is tired of reading his code, offers to ask someone else to read his code. Ponytail insults him again by saying that nobody would want to review his code after seeing it for the first time.
Forth is an old programming language that tends to be difficult to read. A cryptogram is a cipher puzzle, generally one easy enough to be solved manually. The title text implies that the code is so bad that it looks like unreadable FORTH code that is missing random characters.
Transcript
- [Ponytail sitting in front of a computer screen typing. Cueball speaks only off-panel, but since this is a direct continuation of comic 1513 and 1695: Code Quality and Code Quality 2 where Cueball is shown, there can be no doubt it is him.]
- Ponytail: Your code looks like song lyrics written using only the stuff that comes after the question mark in a URL.
- Cueball (off-panel): Sorry.
- [Zoom in on Ponytail's upper body.]
- Ponytail: It's like a JSON table of model numbers for flashlights with "tactical" in their names.
- [Zoom back out again. Ponytail has lifted her hands off the table.]
- Ponytail: Like you read Turing's 1936 paper on computing and a page of JavaScript example code and guessed at everything in between.
- [Zoom in again on Ponytail's face.]
- Ponytail: It's like a leet-speak translation of a manifesto by a survivalist cult leader who's for some reason obsessed with memory allocation.
- Cueball (off-panel): I can get someone else to review my code.
- Ponytail: Not more than once, I bet.
Discussion
I think the FORTH in the title text also references the CIA statue, which is a cryptogram with 3 parts solved and the fourth part remains unsolved. Possibly also the date May fourth, which was a popular topic on reddit because of Star Wars (and because this comic was posted just after May 4). 173.245.50.102 18:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
No. Unlike the computer on which the Forth language was developed, comics allow words with more than 5 letters to be used, so if it was a reference to these it would have been spelled 'Fourth'. The programming language would also have been spelled that way if Chuck Moore had had a decent computer (but maybe then he wouldn't have invented the language). He reckoned it was a fourth-generation language, superseding third-gen languages like C or Pascal. We all have blind spots about the potential of our pet projects. Or kids. 162.158.38.28 13:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I know Elonka (the CIA Kryptos expert), and I think she'd disagree. 172.68.54.58 15:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Please describe JSON table. Apparently it's some type of programming language that is so popular that Google can't find a definition among all the examples.--162.158.62.21 17:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Could the reference to "tactical" flashlights be a dig at the current practice of taking a standard flashlight and adding things like crenelated bezels, high-powered LEDs, multiple flashing modes, heavy casings etc.? "Tactical" has turned into a nearly meaningless advertising buzzword, as a current search on Amazon ("tactical flashlight") turns up over 20,000 listings.These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Does the timing of Halley's comet meteor shower apply to the last panel? Amber (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
As I review this series of comics, I really wonder if the text is intended to be set to music, and if so what pop song it scans against. Any takers? JohnHawkinson (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I believe this comic strip is a reference to the Deadpool movie, in which the main character, Wade, is given a battery of insults by his best friend. If you look at the behind the scenes footage, you will see that the person giving the insults actually has a much longer barrage of insults before Deadpool ultimately states his impatience, and that the list of insults was actually quite enough as-is. Watch it and you will see the similarities.172.68.146.14 10:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)