Difference between revisions of "Template:blog"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(did the IP thing)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<includeonly> data-sort-value="{{{1|0}}}" style="background-color:#cceeff;"|<!--Featured in the [[what if? (blog)|''what&nbsp;if?''&nbsp;blog]], -->Blog article <!--&nbsp;-->'''{{{1|0}}}''', on {{{2|}}}&#8209;{{{3|}}}&#8209;{{{4|}}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{5|}}}|<br>({{{5|}}})}}</includeonly><noinclude><!--
+
<includeonly> data-sort-value="{{formatnum:{{{1|0}}}|R}}" style="background-color:#cceeff;"|<!--Featured in the [[what if? (blog)|''what&nbsp;if?''&nbsp;blog]], -->'''{{ordinal|{{{1|0}}}}}''' blog article, on {{#time:Y&#8209;m&#8209;d|{{{2|{{REVISIONYEAR}}}}}-{{{3|{{REVISIONMONTH}}}}}-{{{4|{{REVISIONDAY}}}}}}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{5|}}}|<br><small>''({{{5|}}})''</small>}}</includeonly><noinclude><!--
  
  

Revision as of 09:02, 31 January 2025

Used for in the what if? index, to mark the article number and date of release. For the books, use Template:book1, Template:book2, etc. The date and number are always needed.

Usage

{{blog|ARTICLE-NUMBER|YYYY|MM|DD|LATE-OR-EARLY}}


Examples

{{blog|69|YYYY|MM|DD|1m 19d late}}

Produces:

 data-sort-value="69" style="background-color:#cceeff;"|

69th blog article, on YYYY‑MM‑DD
(1m 19d late)

and

{{blog|69|YYYY|MM|DD}}

Produces:

 data-sort-value="69" style="background-color:#cceeff;"|

69th blog article, on YYYY‑MM‑DD

and

{{blog|69}}

Produces:

 data-sort-value="69" style="background-color:#cceeff;"|

69th blog article


N Date Thumbnail Title Reader's question Randall's answer Book
1 2012‑07‑10 Relativistic Baseball.png Relativistic Baseball "What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?" The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, and possibly a ruling of "hit by pitch".

3rd blog article, on YYYY‑MM‑DD

2 2012‑07‑10
0w later
SAT Guessing.png SAT Guessing "What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple‑choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?" No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect scoNo one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. SUPPOSED TO BE BROKEN HERE

65th blog article

3 2012‑07‑10
0w later
SAT Guessing.png SAT Guessing "What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple‑choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?" No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a.

9th blog article, on YYYY‑MM‑DD

4 2012‑07‑10
0w later
SAT Guessing.png SAT Guessing "What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple‑choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?" No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a perfect score. No one would get a.

169th blog article, on YYYY‑MM‑DD
(1m 19d late)