| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{comic | | {{comic |
| | | number = 1167 | | | number = 1167 |
| − | | date = January 30, 2013 | + | | date = January 29, 2013 |
| | | title = Star Trek into Darkness | | | title = Star Trek into Darkness |
| | | image = star_trek_into_darkness.png | | | image = star_trek_into_darkness.png |
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | | | |
| | ==Explanation== | | ==Explanation== |
| | + | The talk page of a Wikipedia article is used to discuss changes to the article. Here, [[Randall]] is referring to a {{w|Talk:Star Trek into Darkness#Requested move|talk page discussion}} on the Wikipedia article about ''{{w|Star Trek Into Darkness}}'' (an upcoming Star Trek film) about whether to capitalize the word "into." Wikipedia is {{w|WP:LAME|no stranger}} to lengthy battles over such trivial topics. |
| | | | |
| − | The talk page of a Wikipedia article is used to discuss changes to the article. An {{w|Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war}} is a dispute about a specific edit to an article, manifesting as a series of edits alternating between making and reverting the change, and usually accompanied by a more-or-less heated debate on the talk page.
| + | Cueball suggests a compromise, and changes the title so that every other letter is capitalized. This will probably not go over well. |
| | | | |
| − | Here, [[Randall]] is referring to a dispute on the Wikipedia article about ''{{w|Star Trek Into Darkness|Star Trek I(i)nto Darkness}}'' (an upcoming {{w|Star Trek}} film at the time of the comic's posting). On the day before the comic was published, the article name had a lowercase "into", and the talk page looked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Star_Trek_Into_Darkness&oldid=535542349 like this] (rounded off in a friendly way, with the posting of {{w|User:Frungi/Star Trek Into Darkness capitalization|a summary of the arguments}}, and an exchange of virtual hugs). In summary, the debate centers around whether "I(i)nto Darkness" should be treated as a prepositional phrase (as in "Star Trek[king] I(i)nto Darkness") or an unpunctuated subtitle (as in "Star Trek[:] Into Darkness"), whether compound prepositions like "into" should be capitalized in titles, and whether the capitalization of the title in the movie's official promotional material is relevant. The intensity and multiple facets of a debate over one tiny letter is apparently entertaining to Randall.
| + | Megan's line of "They should have sent a poet." is a quote from the film ''{{w|Contact (film)|Contact}}''; the quote appears in other xkcd comics, such as [[482: Height]]. |
| − | | |
| − | [[Cueball]] changes the title to "~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~" so that every other letter is capitalized, and the title as a whole is framed by tildes and asterisks (a common, but childish and ugly{{citation needed}} way of emphasizing titles online). This is a particularly silly compromise wherein the title is so obviously wrong, both sides will actually agree on something (either agree that Randall's title is wrong or that Randall's title is an acceptable middle ground).
| |
| − | | |
| − | The title text indicates Randall's belief that such arguments are perpetual and will always arise. He suggests that the edit to the Wikipedia page will result in a dispute over variants of Cueballs [[:Category:Compromise|"compromise"]]. One new alternative has the letter cases switched (or shifted, depending on your perspective), one uses a different set of "bracketing" characters (xX_[...]_Xx instead of ~*~[...]~*~), and one uses the original title, but with a lowercase "L" instead of a capital "I" (which appear similar in many fonts).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Alternating-case text later caught on as [https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/mocking-spongebob an internet meme] in 2017 (four years after this comic strip was published) for representing a mocking tone.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Megan|Megan's]] line of "They should have sent a poet." is a quote from the film ''{{w|Contact (1997 American film)|Contact}}''. The quote is also referenced in [[482: Height]]. In the movie, the line was meant to convey that only a poet could adequately capture the beauty seen; here, it indicates that prose is insufficient to capture the ironic beauty of the edit war.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The old "favorite edit war" might be the one referenced in the title text of [[878: Model Rail]] or the one resulting from the addition of the [[739: Malamanteau]] article to Wikipedia
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Transcript== | | ==Transcript== |
| | :[Cueball staring at computer screen.] | | :[Cueball staring at computer screen.] |
| − | :Cueball: Oh, ''wow.'' Look at Wikipedia's Talk page for '''''Star Trek Into Darkness.''''' I have a new favorite edit war. | + | :Cueball: Oh, wow. Look at Wikipedia's Talk page for Star Trek into Darkness. I have a new favorite edit war. |
| | :Megan (off-panel): Oh? | | :Megan (off-panel): Oh? |
| | | | |
| Line 33: |
Line 24: |
| | :Megan: They should have sent a poet. | | :Megan: They should have sent a poet. |
| | | | |
| − | :Cueball: Well, I'm making an executive decision. I hope both sides accept this as a fair compromise. | + | :Cueball: Well I'm making an executive decision. I hope both sides accept this as a fair compromise. |
| − | | |
| − | :[A Wikipedia page titled "''~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~''"]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Trivia==
| |
| − | After the publication of the comic, the debate continued with full force, complete with {{w|Talk:Star Trek Into Darkness/Archive 5#xkcd Mention|a section of xkcd-inspired suggestions}}. The article itself was soon protected, so that only administrators could edit it. A day later, the title was changed to one including a capital "Into" by the administrator {{w|User:Mackensen|Mackensen}}. (The debate continued on {{w|User talk:Mackensen/Archive20#Star Trek into Darkness move|his talk page}}.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/~*~_StAr_TrEk_InTo_DaRkNeSs_~*~ was a valid redirect link for quite some time, having not been deleted when {{w|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 January 25#~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~|requested in 2015}}, but {{w|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 23#~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~|2016}}. The link now redirects to {{w|Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness controversy|Wikipedia ''Star Trek Into Darkness'' controversy}}.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{w|The Independent}} published an article about the "[http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/trekkies-take-on-wikis-in-a-grammatical-tizzy-over-star-trek-into-darkness-8475705.html grammatical tizzy]", and the affair as a whole was added to Wikipedia's humorous list of the {{w|WP:Lamest edit wars|lamest edit wars}}.
| |
| − | | |
| − | There is now a whole Wikipedia page about the controversy: {{w|Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness controversy|Wikipedia ''Star Trek Into Darkness'' controversy}}
| |
| | | | |
| − | {{comic discussion 1167}}
| + | :[A wikipedia page titled "~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~"] |
| | | | |
| | + | {{comic discussion}} |
| | [[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]] | | [[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]] |
| | [[Category:Comics featuring Megan]] | | [[Category:Comics featuring Megan]] |
| − | [[Category:Star Trek]]
| |
| | [[Category:Wikipedia]] | | [[Category:Wikipedia]] |
| − | [[Category:Compromise]]
| |
