Editing 1607: Supreme Court

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
In this comic [[Blondie]] as a [[:Category:News anchor|news anchor]] presents a breaking news story about the {{w|Supreme Court of the United States}} (SCOTUS), the highest judicial body in the United States. Its decisions, as expressed in the judicial opinions of its justices, are often in the news as in this comic. However, the Supreme Court has only nine members. Thus, a ruling that passed 9-1 (for a total of 10 votes) would indicate that a man claiming to be an additional justice has somehow infiltrated the Court. The other nine justices are aware of the non-justice, and make it clear that this tenth justice does not belong. It is unclear if the justices released a formal decision on the subject or if the news is merely reporting the judges' statements as if they were decisions by citing a 9-1 decision (decisions of the SCOTUS are made on the basis of the opinion of the majority of the justices).
+
{{incomplete|Slightly expanded explanation, along with transcript. Not sure who the person is, but one possibility proposed.}}
  
The identity of the "tenth justice" is not revealed in the comic or apparently to the actual justices, and neither is the reason that the interloper's "vote" was counted. Presumably, the nine actual justices voted that the tenth didn't belong while the interloper himself voted the other way.
+
The {{w|Supreme Court of the United States}} is the highest judiciary body in the United States. Its decisions, along with the opinions of its justices, are often in the news, as in the case here. However, the Supreme Court has only nine members. Thus, a ruling that passed 9-1 (for a total of 10 votes) would indicate that an additional justice sneaked in to the court. The other nine justices know that, and make it clear that this tenth justice does not belong. V(Or at least he doesn't belong today. While the size of the Supreme Court has been nine justices since 1869, from 1863 to 1866, there were ten justices on the Supreme Court.)
  
This comic may be motivated by a 2012 survey, commonly cited since, that [http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/two-thirds-of-americans-cant-name-any-us-supreme-court-justices-says-new-findlawcom-survey-166730886.html?utm_expid=43414375-18&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D3%26ved%3D0CG4QFjAC%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.prnewswire.com%252Fnews-releases%252Ftwo-thirds-of-americans-cant-name-any-us-supreme-court-justices-says-new-findlawcom-survey-166730886.html%26ei%3D0FIyUK_yMIT66wGY3YDYDg%26usg%3DAFQjCNFKL_iBiZH9xdpl5Wz5kBrErYgssw two thirds of Americans cannot name a Supreme Court Justice], and general ignorance of Americans overall of their own political landscape, by implying that even Justices are not confident in the identity of other members.
+
This comic may also be a reference to a 2012 survey, commonly cited since, that [http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/two-thirds-of-americans-cant-name-any-us-supreme-court-justices-says-new-findlawcom-survey-166730886.html?utm_expid=43414375-18&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D3%26ved%3D0CG4QFjAC%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.prnewswire.com%252Fnews-releases%252Ftwo-thirds-of-americans-cant-name-any-us-supreme-court-justices-says-new-findlawcom-survey-166730886.html%26ei%3D0FIyUK_yMIT66wGY3YDYDg%26usg%3DAFQjCNFKL_iBiZH9xdpl5Wz5kBrErYgssw two thirds of Americans cannot name a Supreme Court Justice], and general ignorance of Americans overall of their own political landscape, by implying that even Justices are not confident in the identity of other members.
  
The title text refers to {{w|Justice Kennedy}}'s reputation for being a moderate who is usually the swing vote in 5-4 decisions, which means that his vote can decide the outcome of the case which is otherwise split along the political leanings of the other justices. The joke in the title text is that he is weighing the arguments of both sides even though the non-justice is clearly not a justice and would not be allowed to make an argument if he were. The fictional Kennedy humors the impostor's arguments by pretending to give them serious contemplation, finding that they do have some compelling philosophical merit, though not nearly enough to give the impostor any convincing reason for sitting on the Supreme Court.
+
The identity of this person is not known either to the reader or to the actual justices, and neither is the reason that the interloper's "vote" was counted (presumably, the nine actual justices voted that he didn't belong while he himself voted the other way).
 +
The primary suspect, however, would seem to be Black Hat, as he has had preposterous and yet oddly successful run-ins with the US government before (e.g. [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/494:_Secretary:_Part_1 Comic 494]-[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/498:_Secretary:_Part_5 Comic 498])
  
There is a second joke in the title text, that the man is claiming to be two of the current justices, who would actually have been in the room at the same time as the impostor was claiming to be them. To add further absurdity to this, one of those justices the man claimed to be was {{w|Justice Ginsburg}}, who was a woman.
+
The title text refers to {{w|Justice Kennedy}}'s reputation for being a moderate who is usually the swing vote in 5-4 decisions, which means that his vote can decide the outcome of the case. The joke in the title text is that he is weighing the arguments of both sides even though the non-justice is clearly not a justice and would not be allowed to make an argument if he were. The fictional Kennedy is committing the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation Golden Mean Fallacy], also seen in [[690: Semicontrolled Demolition]], and makes the same jab at that fallacy. Sometimes, the views of the two sides are mutually exclusive, or the other side is just wrong.
  
That said, it is possible that this could refer to a point in time in the past. Under the [http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/landmark_08.html Tenth Circuit Act of 1863] the U.S. Supreme Court was expanded to 10 justices; {{w|Stephen Johnson Field}} was named to the 10th seat. Congress abolished the seat via attrition through the [http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/landmark_09.html Judicial Circuits Act of 1866]. Field remained in office until 1897.
+
There is a second joke in the title text, that the man is claiming to be two of the current justices, who would actually have been in the room at the same time as the impostor was claiming to be them. To add further absurdity to this, one of those justices the man was claiming to be was {{w|Justice Ginsburg}}, who is female.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
:[Blondie as a news anchor is sitting at her desk with a small image of scales shown to the left of her.]
+
:[A female newscaster with long blond hair is sitting at her desk with a small image of scales shown to the left.of her] <!-- used to say "her left" which is untrue; to her left is to the observer's right -->
:Blondie: Breaking news: The Supreme Court has ruled 9-1 that they don't know who this guy is or how he got in here, but he's definitely ''not'' a justice.
+
:Newscaster: Breaking news: The Supreme Court has ruled 9-1 that they don't know who this guy is or how he got in here, but he's definitely ''not'' a justice.
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Blondie]]
 
[[Category:News anchor]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)