Talk:2744: Fanservice

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 10:53, 3 March 2023 by 172.69.138.81 (talk)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


I don’t want to be that guy but “I got to the explanation so early that its only 1 sentence!” 172.70.174.43

I also don't want to be that other guy, but while I was composing my "there wasn't anything yet, let's put something there" text, something actually appeared. (Though it just appended my bit, didn't give me Edit Conflict warning.) I'll let someone else mish-mash the useful bits of both fresh-starts together, though. Might be that none of my contribution is worthwhile.
(I took quite a while trying to decide whether to make a joke that if he was a specialist in air-movement devices, without necessarily branching out into any air-conditioning elements, then <something something, insert some useful words here> OnlyFans! So then I obviously eventually decided it wasn't worth it. ;) ) 172.70.90.100 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
New recurring subject?

First we had 2036: Edgelord. Then we had 2654: Chemtrails. Now we have this comic. They all start with "So, I hear" and end with "How to annoy". So I think that a new recurring subject has been established. I'm thinking it should be called something like "How To Annoy Comics". Silver (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Might be best wait for a third one, or more. A category of two is a bit of a stretch. Someone pointed out the prior one, so should be easier to pick up all three+ examples when it becomes a more definite 'thing'.
And if we were to call it "How to annoy" (say) and then the actual third is very similar but actually ends "How to confuse" then the category is already non-descriptive. 172.70.162.46 16:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
There are 3 aren’t there? 172.70.38.150 17:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
There were two originally (I'd forgotten the chemtrails one, myself, when first thinking of this) and, yes, there's now three identified "So I hear/How to annoy"s. Might have crossed the threshold. But leaving that decision to someone who can do something about it. 172.70.90.253 18:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Agreed. --172.70.38.77 18:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
I also agreed and could see that there where already 6 comics about how to Annoy. So I think the Category:How to annoy is well named, and should also include those other comics that are not completely similar to this one. And thus I have created the page and made some description. Also this is similar to other categories like My Bobby, fun facts and protip. So I linked to them from the new category and vise versa. --Kynde (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. --172.70.42.157 13:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Made some rephrasings in the Category (you may have already noticed). I'm also not sure if there should necessary be any "and at this point, we created the category" spiel in describing the category. It seems a bit self-referential.
My ideal way of "explaining the category" would be that the three (or more, given Fan Service is almost exactly the same Cueball vs Annoyed, but with others involved) of the most common form could be listed (chronologically) as being one person saying something that annoys another. If we can be sure it will be promptly updated if/when further core-archetype examples appear (the list of membership is automatic, of course).
Then others (currently Normal + Spiral) could be listed explicitly, if they start to hold similar forms (mathematical plots?), or the fact that there are also other forms is sufficient note. (But this could lead to effectively listing everything twice. Narratively then the auto-list. Breaking out into sub-cats would be better if that got too crazy.)
Ditto with other Categories that have a "And then we realised that..." sort of form. Nicely expounded, often very well written, but I'm not sure it has the right tone. IMO, YMMV. 172.70.162.46 13:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Should the connection to 2036: Edgelord be at the start of the explanation? --Purah126 (talk) 19:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes. --Kynde (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

You know, I always assumed HVAC was "High Voltage Air Conditioning" (though deciding that they should have meant high wattage), i.e. the big strap-on AC units that tends to be found on business/communal buildings rather than a much more simple desk fans and radiators (here in the UK, individual housing tends to not have AC so much, though these days heat-pumps are being integrated into central-heating systems, to look like HVAC units). 172.70.86.128 14:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

No, you are thinking of Heating and Ventilation using Direct Current (HVDC). 172.69.138.81 10:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)