Difference between revisions of "Talk:468: Fetishes"
(Explained Russel's Paradox) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:17, 14 January 2014
I should point out that [1] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --Someone Else 37 (talk) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)