User talk:ConscriptGlossary

Suggestions been made to block C___G___ accounts!

Hi. I'm an admin here and there has been a request to block ColorfulGalaxy and other accounts that are of the form C___G___ like yours, because you all seem to interact and maybe use each others accounts or being one guy with multiple accounts. Specifically the dead links on ColorfulGalaxys page (that has at the moment been removed, hence link to old version) was an offence point. Seems you have ben trying to use this wiki for a project called neology, which does not belong here. Please stop what ever you are doing, and remove any thing related to this or I will be forced to ban all of these accounts. If you stop and begin editing only relevant stuff I will not ban you! Best regads --Kynde (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

The neography project has already been moved. It's been moved several times in fact. ConscriptGlossary (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Li Jiayi

You added a trivia section in 461: Google Maps about Li Jiayi. I’ve never heard of this person, could you please drop a link to wherever you found this so that I can add the Chinese characters? I have Chinese keyboards on my device. 42.book.addict (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Please create this related page. http://esolangs.org/w/index.php?title=User:Vertical_tab_%27N&action=edit&redlink=1 Please create this page with the following text:

:''The title of this page is incorrect because of technical limitations.''

'''Vertical tab 'N''' is a programming challenge. The goal is to write a program that prints the three ASCII characters in this order: a vertical tab (U+000B), an apostrophe, and a capital N. It just so happens that the source code in [[AuFI]] is the stage name of a well-known contemporary musician in China. ([[User talk:Vertical tab 'N]] is one of his fans) The source code in [[PTotE]] also is one of the former stage names of the musician.

== Implementations ==

===[[Befunge]]===

 56+:,2+3*:,2*,@

===[[C++]]===

 #include <cstdio>
 int main(){
 putchar(11);
 putchar(39);
 putchar(78);
 return 0;}

Alternative:

 #include <cstdio>
 int main(){
 printf("%c\'N",11);
 return 0;
 }

===[[Hexdump]]===

 0B 27 4E

===[[Linguine]]===

 1[0=11,0$,0=39,0$,0=78,0$]0

===[[Pascal]]===

 var
 a:char;
 begin
 a:=char(11);write(a);
 a:=char(39);write(a);
 write('N');
 end.

===[[Python]]===

 print(chr(11) + "'N",end='')

== External resources ==
[[Category:Program forms]]

Also create this page http://esolangs.org/wiki/79_9_53

'''79 9 53''' is similar to [[AuFI]] except that it uses atomic numbers instead of element symbols. The language is created by [[User:Vertical tab 'N]].

[[Category:Languages]]
[[Category:Output only]]
[[Category:Total]]
[[Category:Unusable for programming]]
[[Category:Unimplemented]]
[[Category:2024]]

I'm new to esolangs and I only picked some easy ones. This project is mostly inspired by Category:Periodic table. ConscriptGlossary (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please help me. I was IP-banned there and couldn't create accounts. I need help! ConscriptGlossary (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Usage of {{incomplete}}

You've been inserting {{incomplete|...}} in the rough manner of {{Citation needed}}, probably assuming it gives a ^[incomplete] style span-tag. But it inserts an infobox that's paragraph-breaking (if used within one). As you'd see if you Previewed what you did. I'd do an example, but then it'd permanently label your Talk page as 'incomplete', unless I cobbled together a fake version.

If you want to add (new) incomplete-tag info, put it in the traditional place of just below the "==Explanation==" header. Or just make the edits needed to reflect the update of info that you are trying to identify.

I'm going to address these issues for you, but wanted to make sure that you weren't going to continue. Perhaps you could instead tag such things with {{Actual citation needed}}. You can add an 'explanation parameter', as with the incompleteness one. Though it won't show up in the tag itself, it would benefit future editors to know exactly what issue you were raising. 172.69.43.136 13:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Further note: There's no reason to replace {{Citation needed}} with {{cn}} (though, yes, do move the tag the right side of the adjacent punctuation). The 'true template' is "Citation needed" and "cn" (and "citation needed" and "Citation Needed" and "fact" and several others) tend to be aliased/redirected to that. If anything, take the time to replace "...something{{cn}}. Something else..." with "...something.{{Citation needed}} Something else...", while you're adjusting the punctuation, but it doesn't actually help to rename it reverse. It looks the same (insofar as the tag) when viewing the page normally, but doesn't significantly help (and, for the unfamiliar, may more hinder) the understanding of the markup edit. Not worth a special (re)edit, but I'll frequently take the opportunity to use the "one true" template name if I pass something like a "cn" (maybe or maybe not a "fact") when adjusting a other element of a page. 172.70.86.21 15:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Cultural issues.

We understand that those from the PRC still claim the territory of ROC, but it's not your place to tell someone who they are in such a complicated issue. Indeed, they may be of more original Formosan heritage (Gāoshān?), not Chinese Han. Or from, e.g. Qing times well prior to the CPC taking over 'only' mainland China. I don't want to speak on their behalf, but it is certainly nonsensical to use the Taiwanese (and anti-Qing!) flag but state "Chinese" (except in any claim that the Mao Zedong takeover was, and remains, illegitimate - which isn't obviously the case here).

I don't want you to get into trouble, locally, by changing your personal learned understanding of the situation from the official CCP line, but do appreciate that on the worldwide stage there are diplomatic contortions made in order to not directly contradict this but still appreciate that this is a territory in its own right that is a continuation of the pre-revolutionary government. (I am not a diplomat, I probably can't describe it all entirely correctly, as I also have no personal association or bias on the matter. But then I'm also not restrained to the dancing about the issue that an actual government would have to, on the world stage. The point is, opinions differ, as with territorial matter. See also Gaza, Golan Heights, Crimea/Donbass/etc, Transnistria, Ossetia Kosovo, Cyprus, Gibraltar, Falklands, Kashmir, Kuril Islands, etc. In no particular order, to various degrees of dispute, and deliberately trying to avoid mentioning any case in which (either/both) China would still be involved.) Hence it's not really valid to 'correct' such things.

Maybe add caveats in Explanation-type pages (which might be further edited to caveat your caveats, if not totally out of accepted reality), but mostly don't change others' User-page stuff or signed Talk-page statements to "your personal liking". 172.70.91.130 14:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)