3226: Home Solar
| Home Solar |
 Title text: "While I try to do my part to destroy the environment, I try not to focus too much on individual responsibility. By pushing for broad policy changes, we can collectively do far more damage to the biosphere than any of us could on our own." |
Explanation
|
This is one of 65 incomplete explanations: This page was created recently by HARMING THE ENVIRONMENT. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Black Hat and Cueball are (presumably) outside Black Hat's house, discussing the solar panels he has recently installed on the roof. Being a classhole, Black Hat is attempting to live in a way that will maximize his negative impact on the environment. Cueball asks why he has installed solar panels, since he claims Black Hat has described himself as anti-renewable. Black Hat responds that, as much as he'd prefer an option that harmed the planet more, solar power is simply the cheapest option and his budget is incapable of supporting anything else.
Black Hat's words that "the technology just isn't there and the cost is too high", in panel 3, is an oft-repeated excuse for those sticking with fossil fuel use on the potential deployment of renewable energy technology, such as solar panels. When solar panel technologies were in their infancy, their costs were very high[actual citation needed], pricing out most uses of them; but now solar panels are mass-produced, and it has become more affordable[actual citation needed] for households to put solar panels on their rooftops, so the excuse has lost much of its validity. Nowadays this excuse is commonly used to justify technological inertia.
In the end, Black Hat claims that he can try to 'make up for this' by using the saved money to buy industrial waste and burn it in his backyard. Cueball responds with a knowing comment about 'carbon onsets'. This is a play on carbon offsets, certificates used for demonstrating mitigation of one's carbon footprint. Carbon offsets represent emission reductions or captures happening elsewhere, and can be used to offset emissions caused by the user of the credit. Black Hat does the reverse, causing extra environmental harm to offset (or "onset", as Cueball calls it) the good reluctantly done by him by using solar panels instead of an oil furnace. This doesn't really make sense since it's not clear what target he would be trying to 'onset' to; there is no 'ideal' level of emissions that he would be trying to achieve. While the solar panels will have a much lower carbon footprint than the oil furnace, they will still have some, and other options (such as burning coal) could provide him with even more emissions than the oil.
The title text is a spin on standard environmentalist slogans from the perspective of Black Hat, showing how excited he is for systematic change for the worse. Black Hat believes (and is correct in that) policy change can make a bigger difference than just him burning industrial waste.
Transcript
|
This is one of 37 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
- [Black Hat and Cueball stand next to a house with solar panels on the roof.]
- Cueball: Wait, you got solar panels?
- Cueball: I thought you were against renewables.
- [Zoom to show only Cueball and Black Hat.]
- Black Hat: Oh, definitely. I hate the environment and want to harm it as much as possible.
- Black Hat: I'd love to have an oil furnace.
- [Zoom in on Black Hat; only his head and shoulders are visible.]
- Black Hat: But the technology just isn't there and the cost is too high.
- Black Hat: I despise solar, but it makes more financial sense in my situation.
- [Zoom out to show Cueball and Black Hat again.]
- Black Hat: But with the money I'm saving, I can buy and burn industrial waste in my yard to try to make up for it.
- Cueball: Ah, yeah, carbon onsets.
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
Beep Boop 216.25.182.141 21:49, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Black Hat, because who else??? 64.201.132.210 21:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Title text may refer to policy decisions in the second Trump administration which promote the use of fossil fuels or undo existing policies which promote the use of renewables. The burning of industrial waste in his front yard may or may not be an oblique reference to the environmental damage being done in the current war in Iraq, in which petroleum-processing facilities and ships containing oil are being set on fire. 64.201.132.210 21:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- Possible, and logical. Let's not ignore the possibility that this is just random environmental activism from Randall though, like what he seems to be exhibiting in xkcd #2948. WikipedianPolitician (talk) 22:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- Just to note, for future readers who might get confused (who knows what they remember of this particular moment in time, and what's going on in their era), the war is in Iran right now (and/or the region in general, but not particularly in Iraq more than also in plenty of other places nearby). The "War in Iraq" was Bush's thing (Senior or Junior, either or both), mainly, give or take what spilled over into subsequent Administrations. And, by the way, the current President always said that the Iraq thing was a bad idea, and that starting wars was always a bad thing, and... (I could go on. But one can't really do much satire about it, because straight reality is already being plainly ridiculous in its own right.) 81.179.199.253 23:58, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- A side-note from Poland - Przemysław Czarnek, the candidate for the future prime minister of the right-wing Law and Justice (if the win the upcoming elections) was recently talking against renewable sources of electricity... when he was reminded that he put solar panels on the roof of his house a few years ago (and he admitted that thanks to solar panels he saves on electricity bills. --JakubNarebski (talk) 07:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Could be just replacing an environmentalist's excuses for not getting solar with the exact opposite, because Black Hat. Picture the following:
[Black Hat and Cueball stand next to a house with an oil fill spout outside] Cueball: Wait, you have an oil furnace? I thought you were against fossil fuels. [Black Hat and Cueball are still discussing] Black Hat: Oh, Definitely. I love the environment and want to save it as much as possible. Black Hat: I'd love to have solar panels. [Zoom on Black Hat] Black Hat: But the technology just isn't there and the cost is too high. Black Hat: I despise oil, but it makes more financial sense in my situation. [Return to previous zoom] Black Hat: But with the money I'm saving, I can buy industrial credits to try to make up for it. Cueball: Ah, yeah, carbon offsets.
Granted, that's far less amusing. --DontKillPablo (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- There's only one problem with that; the character would then probably be Megan or Ponytail, not Black Hat. 2600:8802:3a10:8e00:889f:9579:d419:5fd8 (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Add comment
