Difference between revisions of "3203: Binary Star"
Mannerisky (talk | contribs) (Very short explanation for starters.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
| − | {{incomplete|This page was created | + | {{incomplete|This page was created by a TV star. Don't remove this notice too soon.}} |
While a "main sequence star" is a real celestial object, a five-pointed star is how stars are often drawn. The comic uses a drawn star shape to be a part of a celestial star system. | While a "main sequence star" is a real celestial object, a five-pointed star is how stars are often drawn. The comic uses a drawn star shape to be a part of a celestial star system. | ||
| − | The title text similarly uses the * symbol, which is sometimes called a star, to be another real celestial star. | + | The title text similarly uses the * symbol, which is sometimes called a star, to be another real celestial star. A "big asterisk" is used as a metaphor for a rather large caveat, symbolizing a long footnote. |
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
Revision as of 09:33, 5 February 2026
| Binary Star |
 Title text: The discovery of a fully typographical star system comes with a big asterisk. |
Explanation
|
This is one of 62 incomplete explanations: This page was created by a TV star. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
While a "main sequence star" is a real celestial object, a five-pointed star is how stars are often drawn. The comic uses a drawn star shape to be a part of a celestial star system.
The title text similarly uses the * symbol, which is sometimes called a star, to be another real celestial star. A "big asterisk" is used as a metaphor for a rather large caveat, symbolizing a long footnote.
Transcript
|
This is one of 43 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
here before the explanation Qwertyuiopfromdefly (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Me too 115.70.50.73
- It was me as well :::;) 216.25.182.141 05:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Here before the comments 82.13.184.33 09:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- It was me as well :::;) 216.25.182.141 05:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Randall has been, uh, funnier… I thought I must be missing something, a clever joke or some astronomers insider, but no—that's really all there was to it. Well. 2a02:908:c30:5000:b86c:d747:e182:c327 (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Nice to see that Randall has graduated from the woes of 1029, and now can draw Morocco-style stars :-) --2001:A62:5F7:FB01:BF80:8165:D7C9:B014 08:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
The idea of pointed stars alongside normal ones is probably a reference to the James Web Space Telescope. In its images, very bright stars have diffraction spikes, caused by the segmented hexagonal primary mirrors and the three-strut support of the secondary mirror. However, these form 8 spiked images not 5. The Hubble Space Telescope forms 4 spike images, however the effect was not so noticeable with Hubble. 2A12:F41:145B:1300:C59:505F:B2DB:7572 12:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC) dww-uk Add comment
