Difference between revisions of "3216: Bazookasaurus"
(→Explanation) |
(→Explanation) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Various dinosaurs developed impressive-looking {{w|Thagomizer|spikes}}, plates, and the like, and the historical assumption has tended to be that these were used as offensive or defensive measures in conflicts with other dinosaurs. However, in some cases, later evidence has cast doubt on this, suggesting that the structures would have been too fragile or immobile to serve the purpose. Instead, it has been proposed that they may have been developed as a means of display, perhaps through a process of {{w|Fisherian_runaway|runaway selection}}. | Various dinosaurs developed impressive-looking {{w|Thagomizer|spikes}}, plates, and the like, and the historical assumption has tended to be that these were used as offensive or defensive measures in conflicts with other dinosaurs. However, in some cases, later evidence has cast doubt on this, suggesting that the structures would have been too fragile or immobile to serve the purpose. Instead, it has been proposed that they may have been developed as a means of display, perhaps through a process of {{w|Fisherian_runaway|runaway selection}}. | ||
| − | This comic shows a Bazookasaurus, a fictitious dinosaur. | + | This comic shows a Bazookasaurus, a fictitious dinosaur, which apparently developed a structure that bears a remarkable resemblance to a bazooka. |
| − | Vascularization studies (studies of vains) and often demonstrate that specific tissues, disease-related vessels, or developmental structures are fragile. This means they are | + | Vascularization studies (studies of vains) and often demonstrate that specific tissues, disease-related vessels, or developmental structures are fragile. This means they are highly susceptible to damage, rupture, leakage, or hemorrhage. A Bazooka wouldn't typically have vains in it, thous a vascularization study would show that there isn't enough bloodflow. |
| − | highly susceptible to damage, rupture, leakage, or hemorrhage. A Bazooka wouldn't typically have vains in it, thous a vascularization study would show that there isn't enough bloodflow. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 6 March 2026
| Bazookasaurus |
 Title text: In contrast to the deep booming sound associated with the cannon in pop culture depictions, recent studies show it actually made more of a 'toot toot!' noise. |
Explanation
|
This is one of 73 incomplete explanations: This page was created ~240 mya, but not for the reasons previously thought. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
As with 3185:_Sauropods, this comic relates to the reinterpretation of fossil remains on the basis of new evidence, resulting in radical new understandings of the creatures involved.
Various dinosaurs developed impressive-looking spikes, plates, and the like, and the historical assumption has tended to be that these were used as offensive or defensive measures in conflicts with other dinosaurs. However, in some cases, later evidence has cast doubt on this, suggesting that the structures would have been too fragile or immobile to serve the purpose. Instead, it has been proposed that they may have been developed as a means of display, perhaps through a process of runaway selection.
This comic shows a Bazookasaurus, a fictitious dinosaur, which apparently developed a structure that bears a remarkable resemblance to a bazooka.
Vascularization studies (studies of vains) and often demonstrate that specific tissues, disease-related vessels, or developmental structures are fragile. This means they are highly susceptible to damage, rupture, leakage, or hemorrhage. A Bazooka wouldn't typically have vains in it, thous a vascularization study would show that there isn't enough bloodflow.
Transcript
|
This is one of 44 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
F1RST P0ST!!SlimothyJ (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- zeroth panel. 82.13.184.33 15:18, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- negative one like 96.225.18.27 15:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
I think we should add what type of dinosaur is it based off, but i'm certainly not a dinosaur guy so i don't know. As a firearm guy (i don't own gund don't worry) i'm offended at the fact that that isn't a bazooka and more like a cannon. 45.178.0.39 16:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I tried looking for examples (I'm sure I've read multiple such - not just a single dinosaur) but the only results I was getting back were about Pokémon fossils, which wasn't exactly helpful... 82.13.184.33 16:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- So there is Spicomellus, where there is debate over whether it was weaponry, display, or both, and Stegosaurus, where it may have been primarily thermoregulation-related (and high vascularization is part of the evidence to support this). Can't find any clear-cut cases where it's not disputed though. 82.13.184.33 17:08, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- There is a Pokémon called Genosect, which is a revived prehistoric Pokémon with a cannon on its back. The cannon was added by modern scientists working for a criminal organization though.--2600:100A:B1CC:B09C:6C09:24FF:9AC2:AA9B 20:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Looks to me to be roughly a protoceratops (in most respects, especially skull, sans 'back decoration'/'bazooka'), or somewhere else (from amongst the no-horned, and not excessively 'frilled', examples) in the whole group of the ceratopsia family. 81.179.199.253 21:36, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Despite the "Bazookausaurus" name, the structure is not actually referred to as a bazooka, only a "weapon". It might have been named by a paleontologist who didn't have much experience with the specific names of heavy weaponry, and the species' name could plausibly stay the same even after it became clear that the weapon wasn't actually a bazooka. Even the "-saurus" suffix itself actually means "lizard", which is now widely known to be an inaccurate description! 104.39.200.58 21:06, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Add comment
