3203: Binary Star
| Binary Star |
 Title text: The discovery of a fully typographical star system comes with a big asterisk. |
Explanation
|
This is one of 60 incomplete explanations: This page was created recently. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Transcript
|
This is one of 43 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
here before the explanation Qwertyuiopfromdefly (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Me too 115.70.50.73
- It was me as well :::;) 216.25.182.141 05:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Here before the comments 82.13.184.33 09:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- It was me as well :::;) 216.25.182.141 05:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Randall has been, uh, funnier… I thought I must be missing something, a clever joke or some astronomers insider, but no—that's really all there was to it. Well. 2a02:908:c30:5000:b86c:d747:e182:c327 (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Nice to see that Randall has graduated from the woes of 1029, and now can draw Morocco-style stars :-) --2001:A62:5F7:FB01:BF80:8165:D7C9:B014 08:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
The idea of pointed stars alongside normal ones is probably a reference to the James Web Space Telescope. In its images, very bright stars have diffraction spikes, caused by the segmented hexagonal primary mirrors and the three-strut support of the secondary mirror. However, these form 8 spiked images not 5. The Hubble Space Telescope forms 4 spike images, however the effect was not so noticeable with Hubble. 2A12:F41:145B:1300:C59:505F:B2DB:7572 12:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC) dww-uk Add comment
