652: More Accurate
| More Accurate |
 Title text: We live in a world where there are actual fleets of robot assassins patrolling the skies. At some point there, we left the present and entered the future. |
Explanation[edit]
This comic spoofs the Terminator series, in which a super-intelligent machine from the future time travels back in time to kill Sarah Connor. As could be expected from a movie, the antagonistic robot is a human-like android.
However, we currently have military "robots" (actually vehicles controlled remotely by people) that are completely unlike anything in the movie. Originally, UAV were only used for surveillance and reconnaissance. But, now more than ever, they are used for attacks. And most importantly, they are not walking humanoids but flying machines. They are not restricted to carrying human-intended guns as in the movie but are armed with powerful explosives and long-range missiles. Thus the name of the comic: Randall points out being attacked by a flying plane-like drone -- such as the Predator drone shown in the last panel (heavily used for offensive operations by the USAF and the CIA in Afghanistan and Pakistan) -- is a much more accurate outcome should the robots rise up against humans.
It is important to note that, in the actual Terminator 1 movie, this substitution would not actually be so simple. The terminator sent back in time knows Sarah Connor's name and city of residence, but not her appearance or address; it locates her by looking her up in a phone book (and ends up killing a number of other women with the same name, as well as its intended target's roommate, before finding the correct Sarah Connor.) Additionally, the terminator regularly operates inside buildings and rearms itself by picking up human small-arms. A Predator-type drone, while a superior killing system, would be unable to do any of that.[citation needed] A drone which could interact with and operate in the human environment with the ease the terminator displays (let alone successfully disguise itself as a human) would be a major accomplishment which no real-world project has yet come close to.
Yet another consideration is that Skynet didn't know how Sarah Connor looked like. All they knew is that she had metal stud in her leg. It would be incredibly hard to identify Sarah from other humans from such high altitude — and it would be hard to land in the middle of a city, even if a landed drone could then do anything useful. Multiple other Sarah Connors were killed by mistake; it's likely a UAV would run out of missiles long before humans run out of Sarah Connors.
One thing that keeps us short of a Terminator scenario is that most of the unmanned aerial vehicles are either pre-programmed or flown remotely by members of the military, and are not left to their own devices.
The title text emphasizes this by pointing out that we have entire fleets of these drones, and notes that at some point, we entered the future.
Similar buildup and Terminator reference are to be found in 1177: Time Robot.
10 years after this comic was published, almost to the day, a movie in the Terminator franchise called Terminator: Dark Fate came out which includes a scene very similar to this comic involving a Predator drone being used by the super-intelligent machine to take out its target. Also, shortly after that movie came out Randall published a comic about it with the same name.
Yet another possible error is that Predator/Reaper-like drones are going to be outdated in the future; while they will be used as reserve or surplus weaponry, Skynet would never send something as outdated to such important mission. Actual state-of-the-art aerial UAV of said time period would resemble modern UAV about as much, as Cold War-era tanks resemble World War 1 tanks. The Terminator movies do actually use aerial hunter-killer drones, and versions of these are seen (and used) in the 'present day' scenes of at least one of the sequel films. However, these are prototypes that are not yet openly deployed (and only do so, in that film, under the influence of the future's 'bad' terminator and for the benefit of the rise of the nascent Skynet). Under the general circumstances of the first film, especially, there's no indication that there's any opportunity for Skynet (not yet existing in the 'present', and constrained by what nature of machines it can send back in time from its future) to employ a futuristic Hunter-Killer of any kind. Indeed, at the time of the first movie, even a future terminator would be hard pressed to hack into the 'semi-autonomous drones' that effectively did not exist.
Transcript[edit]
- [Cueball with a shotgun approaches a woman carrying a tray with glasses.]
- Cueball: Sarah! Come with me if you want to live! A robot assassin has been sent here to kill you!
- [Sarah holds her hands over her mouth. She has presumably dropped the tray, as it lies on the floor.]
- Cueball: I'm here to save you. I may not be as strong or fast as a machine, but I'll fight to keep you-
- [There's a huge orange and yellow explosion. The two are disintegrated and Cueball's shotgun goes flying.]
- BOOM
- [A flying robot assassin is above the bomb site.]
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!Discussion
MOST? You mean some aren't?
Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- Hkmaly (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Do you just not notice the high volume of news literature on the current state of drones? The Atlantic wrote a long feature about it recently. --Quicksilver (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing driverless cars on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. Dawfedora (talk) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. 108.162.212.196 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Autonomy is still pre-programmed, just like driverless cars. The Terminator was also just a pre-programmed drone, at least until it started to develop feelings. There are also automated strikes. The only thing that is required is human verification of intel (which is not that great). flewk (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
At every moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--108.162.229.44 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
And the joke is on everyone when the "drone" turns out to be Soundwave. -Pennpenn 108.162.250.162 06:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
I think Randall hit too closely to home on this one. Uncomfortably close. I will never understand humanity's morbid fetishization of war, destruction, and death. International Space Station (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Like our sex drive, it's not a part of us that can be erased. Just hope our tendencies for compassion and organization are stronger. Nafedalbi (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
