User contributions
- 01:57, 23 February 2024 (diff | hist) . . (+312) . . Talk:2897: Light Leap Years
- 01:52, 23 February 2024 (diff | hist) . . (+16) . . m 2897: Light Leap Years (→Explanation: added "no '(known earthly)' starships", because while we inhabitants of the 21st century are unaware of any starships in the 16th, that does not mean they didn't exist! I WANT TO BELIEVE!)
- 23:20, 16 November 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+10) . . m 2855: Empiricism (He-he-he! The previous witticism must not go unnoticed, although it's not especially funny or clever. It should be translated as ¡Je-je-je!ted for Spanish speakers as Je-je-je)
- 01:56, 7 July 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+319) . . Talk:2798: Room Temperature (citation is not needed needed for hot fusion)
- 19:18, 11 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+70) . . 2761: 1-to-1 Scale (→Explanation: in fact it would would be much larger that Jupiter, to depict 1:1))
- 19:16, 11 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+338) . . Talk:2761: 1-to-1 Scale
- 19:10, 11 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+500) . . Talk:2761: 1-to-1 Scale (are all the gas giants really treated like Venus?)
- 19:02, 11 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-19) . . 2761: 1-to-1 Scale (→Explanation: got rid of {{citation needed}} it's kinda funny to leave it, because it seems so stupid before the following explanation afterwards, but I don't want to further embarrass the contributor ;) >:D)
- 22:42, 16 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+18) . . Talk:2750: Flatten the Planets (replaced == Death's End == Sorry!)
- 22:40, 16 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+616) . . Talk:2750: Flatten the Planets (Archimedes' constant)
- 22:24, 16 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . 2750: Flatten the Planets (→Explanation: moved cite needed after "...with a tensile strength beyond what is likely physically possible for any known form of matter." Because if this statement is true, if logically follows that the planets, of known matter, would not be suitable)
- 22:19, 16 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+783) . . Talk:2750: Flatten the Planets (→Death's End)
- 04:35, 25 September 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+677) . . Talk:2676: Historical Dates (White Lotus and Birth of Unix and Unix Timestamp)
- 04:22, 25 September 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+221) . . 2676: Historical Dates (→Explanation)
- 02:26, 20 August 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+215) . . 2661: Age Milestone Privileges (explained controversy on Jean Calment's Wikipedia article. (I was inspired myself to make a minor correction!))
- 23:19, 24 June 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+130) . . 2637: Roman Numerals (→Explanation: Also "5050" for double "L" might be mistaken for V̅L = five thousand and fifty -clearly the encoding system is far from perfect)
- 22:58, 24 June 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+8) . . 2637: Roman Numerals (→Explanation: added 50=L because of the "l" in "developing")
- 22:54, 24 June 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+62) . . 2637: Roman Numerals (→Explanation: For the title text it's helpful to know 100 = C)
- 21:06, 16 April 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+612) . . Talk:2607: Geiger Counter (birds not getting electrocuted while sitting on power cables)
- 21:18, 11 March 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+284) . . Talk:2592: False Dichotomy
- 21:14, 11 March 2022 (diff | hist) . . (-28) . . 2592: False Dichotomy (→Explanation: replaced "with absolutely no visible reasoning behind it." why "visibly???" Also there is reasoning, he presents a false dichotomy as the reason why to "embrace dichotomies" The original writer doesn't get the joke here at all!)
- 21:11, 11 March 2022 (diff | hist) . . (-23) . . 2592: False Dichotomy (→Explanation: replaced "makes another error, saying" Firstly its purposeful, not an error. He proposed another false dichotomy as an answer for why we "must embrace dichotomies" This is the whole point of the humor here!!!!)
- 21:09, 11 March 2022 (diff | hist) . . (+30) . . 2592: False Dichotomy (replaced "false" with "another false dichotomy". The point is not that its false, but it's a false dichotomy presented as an answer to "embracing dichotomies")
- 05:28, 14 August 2019 (diff | hist) . . (+375) . . 2189: Old Game Worlds (expressing some disappointment of no Atari 2600 games or older...)