3220: Rotational Gravity

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 03:25, 17 March 2026 by 208.59.176.206 (talk) (Transcript)
Jump to: navigation, search
Rotational Gravity
I don't get it. The peak acceleration for passengers was WAY lower than in the giant-waterslide-loop-the-loop incident the other cruise line fired me for.
Title text: I don't get it. The peak acceleration for passengers was WAY lower than in the giant-waterslide-loop-the-loop incident the other cruise line fired me for.

Explanation

Ambox warning blue construction.png This is one of 76 incomplete explanations:
This page was created by A DISMEMBERED WATERSLIDE TEST DUMMY. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

The title text references Action Park's Cannonball Loop, which subjected riders to up to nine gees of acceleration.

Transcript

Ambox warning green construction.png This is one of 44 incomplete transcripts:
Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!
[Cueball stands facing Hairbun and White Hat. Hairbun has a "steaming" symbol above her head indicating anger, while White Hat is facepalming.]
Cueball: I was able to produce artificial gravity by rotating the ship along its longitudinal axis, helping passengers maintain muscle mass on the long-duration voyage!

comment.png  Add comment      new topic.png  Create topic (use sparingly)     refresh discuss.png  Refresh 

Discussion

Beep, Boop! nothing else here yet ;) 216.25.182.141 03:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Counterpoint the the action park thing; i think its referencing 2935 TheTrainsKid (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

For sure. It is a direct reference to that comic. I wonder if they should be seen as a two comics series? I think there is a bit too little for it. If there ever comes a third comic where Cueball is fired from a cruise line I would say there should be made a category for it though. --Kynde (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Is he saying that the ship is rolling? This would not give as much artificial G than pitch or yaw. SDSpivey (talk) 04:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

It all depends on the rotation speed. It is more likely the ship would survive being rotated along that axis. Of course there would then only be gravity away from the central line of the ship. And of course the ship would not survive such a rotation. --Kynde (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
I'm sure it could survive a few rotations. More than the people could. :) SDSpivey (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      comment.png  Add comment