explain xkcd:Sandbox

Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3191 xkcd comics, and only 57 (1.8%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!

 Go to this explanation

Latest comic

Telescope Types

|< < Prev #3182 (December 17, 2025)

Title text: I'm trying to buy a gravitational lens for my camera, but I can't tell if the manufacturers are listing comoving focal length or proper focal length.

|< < Prev Random Explanation

Explanation

This is incomplete: This page was created recently ACCORDING TO A TELESCOPE POINTING BACK IN TIME. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

This comic shows diagrams of a number of different types of telescope, some real and others made up by Randall. It includes both refracting and reflecting designs; see 1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector for the important (according to Randall) differences between them.

Type	Real?	Refractor/Reflector	Description
Prime Focus	Yes	Reflector	A telescope design where the observer/receiver is situated at the focal point of a single mirror. Rare in optics, but a common design in radio telescopes.
Herschelian	Yes	Reflector	A telescope design much akin to Prime Focus but with the mirror tilted so that the observer does not block incoming light. Named after astronomer William Herschel.
Newtonian	Yes	Reflector	Newtonian telescopes employ a second, flat mirror along with the primary parabolic mirror.
Galilean	Yes	Refractor	What might usually come to mind when picturing a telescope. A long tube that uses lenses rather than mirrors (making it a refracting telescope) to magnify images.
Keplerian	Yes	Refractor	An improvement on Galilean telescopes, using a convex lens rather than a concave one at the eyepiece (as shown in the diagram). It does however invert images.
Gregorian	Yes	Reflector	Uses two concave mirrors, the secondary being placed beyond the primary's focal point. The image is reflected back through a hole in the primary mirror. Unique among reflectors in that the image is not inverted.
Cassegrain	Yes	Reflector	Similar to prime focus, but uses a secondary mirror to reflect light through a hole in the primary mirror to the observer (situated at the rear)
Cardboard tube	Yes, but not as a (functional) telescope	Neither	Children may sometimes use tubes, particularly the cardboard middles from paper rolls, as a play 'telescope'. Looking through a tube can give an illusion of magnification by removing distractions and focusing your attention on the object in view, but it doesn't actually magnify the object being viewed. It will still cause a minor optical effect due to diffraction on the edges of the tube.
Kaleido	Yes, but not as a telescope	Reflector	A kaleidoscope is similar in form to the stereotypical 'ship's telescope', being a tubular object that you look in to one end of. However, it isn't really a telescope, because you can't use it to magnify arbitrary objects of interest. The non-viewing end is closed, and you view patterns created by many fragmented reflections of tiny objects contained at the end, rather than remote objects. The mirrors are also usually flat, so there's no magnification.
Liquid Mirror	Yes	Reflector	A telescope with the same design as Prime Focus, using a rotating pool of reflective liquid (most commonly mercury) as a mirror. The diagram adds a straw so that someone can drink the liquid. This would not improve telescope performance or end well for the drinker.
Narcissian	Yes, but not as a telescope	Reflector	This is like a prime focus telescope, but the focus is outside the end of the telescope where the viewer is located, so they can only see themselves, magnified by the concave mirror. This is inspired by the myth of Narcissus, who fell in love with his reflection in a pool of water. A house of mirrors (a typical attraction at a funfair) might feature such a 'telescope', because it is basically a concave mirror. Furthermore, a narcissist, someone who is inordinately self-centered and arrogant (named for Narcissus), would likely appreciate this kind of mirror, as a narcissist would consider self-viewing more worthwhile than viewing the outside world.
Gravitational	Yes	Refractor	Using the gravitational effect of very large objects on the light passing around them to gain a magnified (if distorted) view of objects beyond them. These are formed naturally by large stars (particularly black holes) and galaxies, which can't be constructed on Earth[citation needed]. There are proposals to launch missions to the very far reaches of the Solar System to "construct" a Solar gravitational lens telescope, but the masses and distances involved are not compatible with consumer camera hardware. In the title text, Randall makes a pun on whether the listed focal length of a gravitational lens is measured in the comoving or proper reference frame — that is, whether the expansion of the universe (between the place and time of the lens's creation or construction and Randall's decision to purchase) has been factored out or not. At the cosmological scales between stars and galaxies, where gravitational lensing is most relevant, this is a useful distinction to make, but stars are not for sale (by any legitimate commercial entity) and so nobody would be advertising any focal length in either reference frame for any purchaser.
Geological	No	Reflector	This 'telescope' employs a single mirror to show the observer the 2003 movie The Core, which was universally derided by science-minded people. As a telescope it would not be useful, not least because it cannot be pointed at an arbitrary object. Its relevance to real geology is also dubious.

Transcript

This is one of 30 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

  Add comment        Create topic (use sparingly)       Refresh 

Discussion

Make changes, try things out, or just have fun with the wiki here! Just leave everything above the line alone, please.

---

This is a test. PoolloverNathan^{[stalk the blue seas]} 20:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

This is not. —While False (museum | talk | contributions | logs | rights | printable version | page information | what links there | related changes | Google search | current time: 17:18) 18:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

A foreign student asked me to help fight against his math teacher. That was unusual. He was in that class for just a couple of weeks. The teacher's phone number was sent to me. The student asked me to spam-call the teacher. 172.71.155.55 22:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

here i'm just messing around in html, ignore this

^furhhfghure _{guyrburgryhuyvfr} "rvhru"

interesting way of writing quotations xd

hmmm this one of putting "<p>" in a line break will come in handy for when i want it to start at the same place than the first line

Please beware that <p> on mediawiki also disables automatic paragraph breaks, so you need a closing </p> or you'll break automatic paragraph formatting for the rest of the page. Zmatt (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

edit: da hek did that "</div>" come from An user who has no account yet (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

hi uh its hard to get here. is this a reference to undocumented feature??? hmm... this is interesting.
108.162.241.216 02:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

yum yum [citation needed]

Hiuiedeixgeyceiyedhcdiedcve {{trout}}

This is the leaderboard:

Last 7 days (Top 50)

Rank Score Pages Changes Username 1 264 262 263 管委会篝火无法解放军“赐额“你去呢管理哦法？ 2 22 18 22 TheusafBOT 3 15 4 33 Firestar233 4 13 5 22 BunsenH 5 13 8 14 DollarStoreBa'al 6 12 5 18 Kynde 7 11 4 18 Barry Margolin 8 10 7 9 R128 9 9 9 9 Lp0 on fire 10 9 4 10 Trimutius 11 8 8 8 FaviFake 12 8 8 8 Headphones the stickman 13 6 3 6 DKMell 14 5 1 6 Lordpishky 15 5 5 5 1234231587678 16 5 2 4 David Garfield 17 4 4 4 Victoria 18 4 2 3 CheshireCat 19 4 2 3 Sturmovik 20 4 1 3 Jeff 21 3 1 2 Ianrbibtitlht 22 3 1 2 Paul Nickerson 23 3 1 2 boB 24 3 3 3 Steve Spivey 25 3 1 2 Kevin Stern 26 3 3 3 ExplainEuge.ca 27 3 1 2 Magtei 28 3 1 2 Elektrizikekswerk 29 2 2 2 August Fuller 30 2 2 2 Bobthegoat123 31 2 2 2 Mathmaster 32 2 2 2 KelOfTheStars! 33 2 2 2 NotaBene 34 1 1 1 KarMann 35 1 1 1 Brett Thwaites 36 1 1 1 Daniel G. Axtell 37 1 1 1 Gustaveeiffel314 38 1 1 1 Zabadoh 39 1 1 1 Nachtvogel 40 1 1 1 Jim 41 1 1 1 Lyall Deere 42 1 1 1 Tigerpile 43 1 1 1 GreatWyrmGold 44 1 1 1 Coconut Galaxy 45 1 1 1 Fephisto 46 1 1 1 Vicente Garza Reyna 47 1 1 1 Yaokuan ITB 48 1 1 1 Cantorfunction 49 1 1 1 Joel Croteau 50 1 1 1 PDesbeginner

<a href=" [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING][tab] "Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.">
        Add comment

---

        View comic discussion

New here?

Last 30 days (Top 10)

Rank Score Pages Changes Username 1 5,856 5,828 6,026 DollarStoreBa'al 2 2,727 2,702 2,862 Victoria 3 264 262 263 管委会篝火无法解放军“赐额“你去呢管理哦法？ 4 82 71 99 TheusafBOT 5 41 37 41 Lp0 on fire 6 25 20 26 R128 7 24 13 46 Barry Margolin 8 24 13 44 Trimutius 9 20 11 33 BunsenH 10 20 16 20 FaviFake

Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors above have just joined. You can do it too! Create your account here.

You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to create an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for xkcd comics, characters, What If? articles, and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd comic, it should be here.

• If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.

• Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.

• You can browse the comics from the list of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.

• The incomplete explanations are listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!

Rules

Don't be a jerk!

There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.

If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.

Please only submit material directly related to xkcd and, of course, only submit material that can legally be posted and freely edited. Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.

If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.