Difference between revisions of "3255: Planetary Science"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Transcript: astro)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
{{incomplete|This comic was found on a planet with life on it}}
+
{{incomplete|This comic was found on a planet with internet on it!}}
This is presented as a scientific article in which astronomers claim to have discovered "signs of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone" --  however, as the accompanying photos (four people on a beach, of whom two are sitting under an umbrella and one is making sand castles) show, the planet in question is Earth. This would not be considered a noteworthy discovery.
+
This comic is presented as a scientific article in which astronomers claim to have discovered "signs of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone" --  however, as the accompanying photos (four people on a beach, of whom two are sitting under an umbrella and one is making sand castles) show, the planet in question is Earth. This would not be considered a noteworthy discovery.{{cn}} Finding other planets that have liquid water is a notable result, as water is necessary to support life, so a planet with water could possibly have life on it. However, we already know about life on Earth existing, so this article is hardly useful or practical.
  
There is value in using Earth as an example of a planet in a habitable zone, such as [https://www.nasa.gov/universe/atacama-rover-astrobiology-drilling-studies-arads/ testing life-detection experiments in remote inhospitable environments] or [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-would-we-know-theres-life-on-earth-this-bold-experiment-found-out/ as a proxy for future astronomical observations], but not in-situ photographic investigation.  Maybe the astronomers should have brought their spectrometer on vacation.
+
There is value in using Earth as an example of a planet in a habitable zone, such as [https://www.nasa.gov/universe/atacama-rover-astrobiology-drilling-studies-arads/ testing life-detection experiments in remote inhospitable environments] or [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-would-we-know-theres-life-on-earth-this-bold-experiment-found-out/ as a proxy for future astronomical observations], but not in-situ photographic investigation.  Maybe the astronomers should have brought their {{w|spectrometer}} on vacation.
  
An {{w|institutional review board}} is a committee of researchers which ensures that research carried out at their institution is ethical. In the title text, this is referenced to be the literal name of a {{w|surfboard}}, which is a board used for the recreational activity of {{w|surfing}}, not serious academic activities.  
+
An {{w|institutional review board}} is a committee of researchers which ensures that research carried out at their institution is ethical. In the title text, this is referenced to be the literal name of a {{w|surfboard}}, which is a board used for the recreational activity of {{w|surfing}}, not serious academic activities. Presumably one of the researchers used this as an excuse to post their pictures of a surfing holiday. Of course, 'the Institutional Review Board' is a very strange name for a surfboard,{{Citation needed}} and its only purpose would be for this (somewhat bad) excuse.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
 
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
 
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
[A journal entry is shown,  with 3 sections of blurred text, and 2 pictures - On on the top-right showing people at the beach, and another at the bottom-left showing the sea.]
+
:[A journal entry is shown,  with 3 sections of blurred text, and 2 pictures - On on the top-right showing Jill and Kidball playing at the beach - Jill running, Cueball building a sandcastle, while Cueball and Megan under an umbrella watching them, and another at the bottom-left showing the sea running alongside the beach.]
[Title of journal article:] Evidence of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone
+
:[Title of journal article:] Evidence of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone
 
+
:[caption below text:] Planetary science journals have asked astronomers to please stop submitting their vacation photos.
[caption below text:] Planetary science journals have asked astronomers to please stop submitting their vacation photos.
 
 
{{comic discussion}}<noinclude>
 
{{comic discussion}}<noinclude>
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring children]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Jill]]
 +
[[Category:Scientific research]]
 +
[[Category:Astronomy]]

Latest revision as of 19:29, 5 June 2026

Planetary Science
The research was overseen by the Institutional Review Board, which is what I named my surfboard.
Title text: The research was overseen by the Institutional Review Board, which is what I named my surfboard.

Explanation[edit]

Ambox warning blue construction.png This is one of 44 incomplete explanations:
This comic was found on a planet with internet on it! If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

This comic is presented as a scientific article in which astronomers claim to have discovered "signs of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone" -- however, as the accompanying photos (four people on a beach, of whom two are sitting under an umbrella and one is making sand castles) show, the planet in question is Earth. This would not be considered a noteworthy discovery.[citation needed] Finding other planets that have liquid water is a notable result, as water is necessary to support life, so a planet with water could possibly have life on it. However, we already know about life on Earth existing, so this article is hardly useful or practical.

There is value in using Earth as an example of a planet in a habitable zone, such as testing life-detection experiments in remote inhospitable environments or as a proxy for future astronomical observations, but not in-situ photographic investigation. Maybe the astronomers should have brought their spectrometer on vacation.

An institutional review board is a committee of researchers which ensures that research carried out at their institution is ethical. In the title text, this is referenced to be the literal name of a surfboard, which is a board used for the recreational activity of surfing, not serious academic activities. Presumably one of the researchers used this as an excuse to post their pictures of a surfing holiday. Of course, 'the Institutional Review Board' is a very strange name for a surfboard,[citation needed] and its only purpose would be for this (somewhat bad) excuse.

Transcript[edit]

Ambox warning green construction.png This is one of 27 incomplete transcripts:
Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!
[A journal entry is shown, with 3 sections of blurred text, and 2 pictures - On on the top-right showing Jill and Kidball playing at the beach - Jill running, Cueball building a sandcastle, while Cueball and Megan under an umbrella watching them, and another at the bottom-left showing the sea running alongside the beach.]
[Title of journal article:] Evidence of liquid water on the surface of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone
[caption below text:] Planetary science journals have asked astronomers to please stop submitting their vacation photos.

comment.png  Add comment      new topic.png  Create topic (use sparingly)     refresh discuss.png  Refresh 

Discussion

Hey I discovered sentient creatures on the planet! --Kirinhatchi (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

"Sentient" :D :D 130.76.187.47 14:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I used to think there was intelligent life. Then they elected Trump. Barmar (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Earth can be used as a test case for detectors of life. If your method is not detecting life on earth, then your detector produces too many false negatives. For instance the galileo space probe was tested with Earth during a fly-by, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_project#Remote_detection_of_life_on_Earth. --2001:4091:A241:81DC:E857:F66B:684E:C4FD 18:25, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
      comment.png  Add comment