explain xkcd:Museum
Revision as of 01:55, 22 February 2025 by 172.71.218.135 (talk)
Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3212 xkcd comics,
and only 57
(1.8%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!
Latest comic
| Telescope Types |
 Title text: I'm trying to buy a gravitational lens for my camera, but I can't tell if the manufacturers are listing comoving focal length or proper focal length. |
Explanation
|
This is incomplete: This page was created recently ACCORDING TO A TELESCOPE POINTING BACK IN TIME. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
This comic shows diagrams of a number of different types of telescope, some real and others made up by Randall. It includes both refracting and reflecting designs; see 1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector for the important (according to Randall) differences between them.
| Type | Real? | Refractor/Reflector | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prime Focus | Yes | Reflector | A telescope design where the observer/receiver is situated at the focal point of a single mirror. Rare in optics, but a common design in radio telescopes. |
| Herschelian | Yes | Reflector | A telescope design much akin to Prime Focus but with the mirror tilted so that the observer does not block incoming light. Named after astronomer William Herschel. |
| Newtonian | Yes | Reflector | Newtonian telescopes employ a second, flat mirror along with the primary parabolic mirror. |
| Galilean | Yes | Refractor | What might usually come to mind when picturing a telescope. A long tube that uses lenses rather than mirrors (making it a refracting telescope) to magnify images. |
| Keplerian | Yes | Refractor | An improvement on Galilean telescopes, using a convex lens rather than a concave one at the eyepiece (as shown in the diagram). It does however invert images. |
| Gregorian | Yes | Reflector | Uses two concave mirrors, the secondary being placed beyond the primary's focal point. The image is reflected back through a hole in the primary mirror. Unique among reflectors in that the image is not inverted. |
| Cassegrain | Yes | Reflector | Similar to prime focus, but uses a secondary mirror to reflect light through a hole in the primary mirror to the observer (situated at the rear) |
| Cardboard tube | Yes, but not as a telescope | Neither | Looking through a tube can give an illusion of magnification by removing distractions and helping you focus, but doesn't actually magnify the object being viewed. |
| Kaleido | Yes, but not as a telescope | ReflectorrotcelfeR | A kaleidoscope isn't really a telescope, because the non-viewing end is closed. You view many reflections of tiny objects at the end, rather than remote objects. The mirrors are also usually flat, so there's no magnification. |
| Liquid Mirror | Yes | Reflector | A telescope with the same design as Prime Focus, using a rotating pool of reflective liquid (most commonly mercury) as a mirror. The diagram adds a straw so that someone can drink the liquid. This would not improve telescope performance or end well for the drinker. |
| Narcissian | Yes, but not as a telescope | Reflector | This is like a prime focus telescope, but the focus is outside the end of the telescope where the viewer is located, so they can only see themselves, greatly magnified. This is inspired by the myth of Narcissus, who fell in love with his reflection in a pool of water. A House of mirrors (a typical attraction at a funfair) might feature such a "telescope", because it is basically a concave mirror. |
| Gravitational | Yes | Refractor | Using the gravitational effect of very large objects on the light passing around them to gain a magnified (if distorted) view of objects beyond them. These are formed naturally by large stars (particularly black holes) and galaxies, which can't be constructed on Earth[citation needed]. There are proposals to launch missions to the very far reaches of the Solar System to "construct" a Solar gravitational lens telescope, but the masses and distances involved are not compatible with consumer camera hardware. In the title text, Randall makes a pun on whether the listed focal length of a gravitational lens is measured in the comoving or proper reference frame — that is, whether the expansion of the universe (between the place and time of the lens's creation or construction and Randall's decision to purchase) has been factored out or not. At the cosmological scales between stars and galaxies, where gravitational lensing is most relevant, this is a useful distinction to make, but stars are not for sale (by any legitimate commercial entity) and so nobody would be advertising any focal length in either reference frame for any purchaser. |
| Geological | No | Reflector | This 'telescope' employs a single mirror to show the observer the 2003 movie "The Core". As a telescope it would not be useful, not least because it cannot be pointed at anything in the sky. Its relevance to real geology is also dubious. |
Transcript
|
This is one of 30 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
Maybe it's more of statistics than exhibitions. --While False (speak|museum) 21:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
pixels-assembly-3.png
how is it 0 bytes?? i see that it is shown as 0 bytes on the wiki, but the file itself, when downloaded is 5kb! how???108.162.221.209 16:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf
- If the question is how it can be written like that here, the answer is that I used the numbers of the wiki. —While False (speak|museum) 19:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, should have made it more clear. Do you know why it is shown as 0 bytes on the file page? 172.70.134.103 12:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf
- There's always the possibility that this is actually the Null image under the .png file format. Every other .png is defined by the delta required to display the desired graphic when starting from the baseline of this 'ur'-image, but if you ever wanted to display that graphic the undocumented format specifications allow you to omit all unnecessary bytes (including the magic header bytes) and it will happily produce its hardcoded "it's a PNG!" preprocessing template, which happens to be this image. Obviously, the PNG spec (and, ultimately, the original ancestor of the detailed source code tree for every subsequent implementation) was written before Randall ever got anywhere near to drawing this image so the chances are slim that he just happened to luck upon the exact image that happens to have a 100% compression rate because it just happened to consist of something Randall wanted to draw, and in the manner of Randall's artistry. But it's a non-zero likelihood that an arbitrary artist might draw exactly the same image as a purely arbitrary "index null" page's collection of pixels and so... This might not be the Best Of All Worlds, but there has to be some highly fortunate occurance to balance out all the unfortunate ones, statistically, and this is ours!
- (Or maybe there's a minor bug/data-error in the way the wiki database serves the front-end webserver, but I can't ask you to believe something as trivially random as that!)) 172.70.90.245 15:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Add comment
- Sorry, should have made it more clear. Do you know why it is shown as 0 bytes on the file page? 172.70.134.103 12:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf
Is this out of date? .
New here?
Last 7 days (Top 10) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors, listed above, have just joined. You can do it too! Create your account here.
You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.
- If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this Wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.
- Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.
- You can browse the comics from List of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.
- There are incomplete explanations listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!
Rules
Don't be a jerk!
There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.
If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.
Please only submit material directly related to (and helping everyone better understand) xkcd... and of course only submit material that can legally be posted (and freely edited). Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.
If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.
