Difference between revisions of "38: Apple Jacks"
m (New category name) |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
| − | {{w|Apple Jacks}} is a breakfast cereal produced by {{w|Kellogg's}}. As the title text begins to explain, there was an ad campaign for the cereal in the 1990s that focused on someone (usually someone in authority like a parent) pointing out that Apple Jacks doesn't taste like apples, and one or more kids pointing out that it doesn't matter and that "we eat what we like. | + | {{w|Apple Jacks}} is a breakfast cereal produced by {{w|Kellogg's}}. As the title text begins to explain, there was an ad campaign for the cereal in the 1990s that focused on someone (usually someone in authority like a parent) pointing out that Apple Jacks doesn't taste like apples, and one or more kids pointing out that it doesn't matter and that "we eat what we like". However, instead of laughing off his dad's comment and correcting him, as in the campaign, this son responds by simply saying "Fuck off, Dad.". |
| − | This could be a commentary on today's youth being far less respectful, as the son is playing video games and seems annoyed at being interrupted, though this does not align with Randall’s public views. It may not be the first time the father has used the line, and the son is irritated by the repetition. It could also be saying that the response in the ads is unrealistic, and this is a much more realistic response. | + | This could be a commentary on today's youth being far less respectful, as the son is playing video games and seems annoyed at being interrupted, though this does not align with Randall’s public views. It may not be the first time the father has used the line, and the son is irritated by the repetition. It could also be saying that the response in the ads is unrealistic, and this is a much more realistic response. The same ad campaign was referenced previously in [[27: Meat Cereals]] on a parody cereal labelled Scrapple Jacks. Cereal advertising would be referenced again in [[1470: Kix]]. |
| − | + | The title text may be to help people get the joke. This is another of the early comics where [[Randall]] felt the need to explain the joke in the title text, see for instance [[30: Donner]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The title text | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
==Trivia== | ==Trivia== | ||
| − | *This was the | + | * This was the thirty-nineth comic originally posted to [[LiveJournal]]. The previous one was [[42: Geico]], and the next one was [[43: Red Spiders 2]]. |
| − | + | * Original title: "Wednesday's Drawing - Apple Jacks" | |
| − | + | * Original [[Randall]] quote: "Who else remembers those commercials?" | |
| − | *Original title: "Wednesday's Drawing - Apple Jacks" | + | * This comic was posted on [[xkcd]] when the web site opened on Sunday the 1st of January 2006. |
| − | *Original [[Randall]] quote: "Who else remembers those commercials?" | + | ** It was posted along [[:Category:First day on xkcd|with all 41 comics]] posted before that on LiveJournal as well as a few others. |
| − | *This comic was posted on [[xkcd]] when the web site opened on Sunday the 1st of January 2006. | + | ** The latter explaining why the numbers of these 41 LiveJournal comics ranges from 1-44. |
| − | **It was posted along [[:Category:First day on xkcd|with all 41 comics]] posted before that on LiveJournal as well as a few others. | ||
| − | **The latter explaining why the numbers of these 41 LiveJournal comics ranges from 1-44. | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{comic discussion}} |
[[Category:Posted on LiveJournal| 39]] | [[Category:Posted on LiveJournal| 39]] | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 29 July 2023
| Apple Jacks |
 Title text: There used to be these ads, see... |
Explanation
Apple Jacks is a breakfast cereal produced by Kellogg's. As the title text begins to explain, there was an ad campaign for the cereal in the 1990s that focused on someone (usually someone in authority like a parent) pointing out that Apple Jacks doesn't taste like apples, and one or more kids pointing out that it doesn't matter and that "we eat what we like". However, instead of laughing off his dad's comment and correcting him, as in the campaign, this son responds by simply saying "Fuck off, Dad.".
This could be a commentary on today's youth being far less respectful, as the son is playing video games and seems annoyed at being interrupted, though this does not align with Randall’s public views. It may not be the first time the father has used the line, and the son is irritated by the repetition. It could also be saying that the response in the ads is unrealistic, and this is a much more realistic response. The same ad campaign was referenced previously in 27: Meat Cereals on a parody cereal labelled Scrapple Jacks. Cereal advertising would be referenced again in 1470: Kix.
The title text may be to help people get the joke. This is another of the early comics where Randall felt the need to explain the joke in the title text, see for instance 30: Donner.
Transcript
- [Cueball is standing holding a bowl in his hand. His son is sitting on the floor playing video games.]
- Cueball: Hey, these don't taste like apples!
- Son: Fuck off, Dad.
Trivia
- This was the thirty-nineth comic originally posted to LiveJournal. The previous one was 42: Geico, and the next one was 43: Red Spiders 2.
- Original title: "Wednesday's Drawing - Apple Jacks"
- Original Randall quote: "Who else remembers those commercials?"
- This comic was posted on xkcd when the web site opened on Sunday the 1st of January 2006.
- It was posted along with all 41 comics posted before that on LiveJournal as well as a few others.
- The latter explaining why the numbers of these 41 LiveJournal comics ranges from 1-44.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!Discussion
First.
- Second
- Four Hundred Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Second.
- Please at least say who you are (preferably add '~ ~ ~ ~'). Beanie (talk) 12:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Without the spaces dudeHiihaveanaccount (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- ok~ ~ ~ ~
- no ~ ~ ~ ~
I think a better interpretation might be that the dad saw the ads when he was a kid, and is trying to be the dad in the ads, but the response is not what he expected. --Calion (talk) 06:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
