Main Page

Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3263 xkcd comics, and only 44 (1.4%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!

Latest comic

Go to this comic explanation

Detector

|< < Prev #3254 (June 3, 2026)

Title text: No other experiment has a lower false negative rate.

|< < Prev Random Explanation

Explanation

Ponytail and Hairy are showing Cueball a machine, claiming it is their most sensitive detector. Normally, detectors have a designated detecting job, such as smoke detectors which detect smoke. Being more sensitive means that it can detect (and perhaps quantify) far lower quantities/magnitudes of the target of its detections.

In this case, "more sensitive" seems to mean that it is sensitive to more different things. To quote Ponytail, it detects "gas, dust, particles, light, radio waves, gamma rays, protons, neutrons, electrons, fields, forces, events, potentials, or states", which runs almost the entire gamut of things that might be detectable, and leaves little room for there being any situation in which none of the aforementioned items are there to be detected. The constituent particles of the machine itself would be present for detection, and exist in "states" and have "potentials" relative to each other... assuming that the machine is sensitive enough to detect them.

Cueball points this out and Hairy says that it has been continuously lit this way since they turned it on. And Ponytail is left shocked when Cueball asks what would happen if the light labeled "Not detected" were to shine. Hairy claims that such a thing would be pretty bad, the presumption being that, if that were to happen, there would have to be no matter, light, forces, etc. within the detector's range of detection. (With almost no reason for the "Not detected" light to shine, they could have simply provided continuous power to the "Detected" light, but the reactions of the experts present show that neither of them think that this has been done.) Of course, a simpler explanation (and one far more likely to be correct) would be that the machine was just not working properly.

The title text states that the machine has the lowest false-negative rate out of any other machine as the "Detected" light will always continue shining. If it never ever states a negative, then it can never be wrong about it being negative, even though it is not clear what circumstances would result in a negative state being required, nor whether the detector will then (correctly) state that, rather than just continue to provide a (now) false-positive.

Randall had recently talked about detectors in 3249: Neutrino Project.

Transcript

[Hairy is standing to the right of a large machine labeled "Detector". The front of the machine has two lights, labeled "Detected" and "Not detected". The "detected" light is lit up in green. Ponytail and Cueball walk towards the machine from the left.]

Ponytail: Over there are our electron microscope, XRF scanner, and mass spectrometer.

Ponytail: And this is our most sensitive detector.

Cueball: What does it detect?

[The next panel zooms in on the detector. Ponytail's voice comes from the left of the panel.]

Ponytail (off-panel): Lots of stuff.

Ponytail (off-panel): Gas, dust, particles, light, radio waves, gamma rays, protons, neutrons, electrons, fields, forces, events, potentials, or states.

[The next panel zooms out. Cueball and Ponytail are standing to the left of the machine, and Hairy on the right.]

Cueball: I don't understand. Aren't most of those always present?

Hairy: Yeah, it's been saying "detected" continuously since we turned it on.

[Cueball and Ponytail still standing to the left of the machine, and Hairy on the right. Ponytail has her hand on her chin.]

Cueball: What happens if it says "not detected"?

Ponytail: Oh gosh.

Hairy: That would be pretty bad, I think.

Is this out of date? .

New here?

Last 7 days (Top 10)

Rank Score Pages Changes Username 1 32 26 34 YZ100 2 21 17 21 TheusafBOT 3 19 9 33 GSLikesCats307 4 12 9 11 Victoria 5 12 6 14 MrCandela2 6 9 5 9 BunsenH 7 8 2 11 kleines Filmröllchen 8 6 4 5 FaviFake 9 6 3 5 Robert'); DROP TABLE 'Users';-- 10 6 3 5 DKMell

Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors, listed above, have just joined. You can do it too! Create your account here.

You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.

• If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this Wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.

• Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.

• You can browse the comics from List of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.

• There are incomplete explanations listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!

Rules

Don't be a jerk!

There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.

If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.

Please only submit material directly related to (and helping everyone better understand) xkcd... and of course only submit material that can legally be posted (and freely edited). Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.

If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.